Skip to content
https://beavercheck.com Export & share
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
100
TTFB degrading ↓
113ms
FCP stable →
1.1s
LCP stable →
1.5s
Scanned
2026-04-04 15:43 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 New York
Duration
40.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

5/5 locations

High global latency — average 709ms across 5 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (62ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1280ms). No CDN detected. 3 locations above the 500ms target.

United Stated - New York
Full audit
376ms
DNS 74ms · TLS 78ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
Full audit
62ms
DNS 13ms · TLS 16ms
United Stated - Santa Clara
Full audit
896ms
DNS 307ms · TLS 149ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
Full audit
1280ms
DNS 430ms · TLS 215ms
Singapore - Singapore
Full audit
932ms
DNS 277ms · TLS 166ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 709ms · Cache: max-age=60

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

2 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

0

High impact, requires investment.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (2)

Sorted by impact
Warning: 1

Unattributable: 322ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
Warning: 2

https://beavercheck.com/: 606ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. The 2 performance issues below shape how fast users perceive your page. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your conversion rate.
2 performance issues — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Conversion barriers

1 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~3%.

Barriers
1
1 warn
Bounce delta
+3pp
added vs baseline
Score
97
A+
Speed
0
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
0
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Warning:Cost of inaction

€903 / month at risk ~€10.835 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

€903 /mo

+3.2pp bounce · ~322 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.80

Bandwidth Waste

€0,04 /mo

553.8 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~55 KB per page load
    Saves €0,04/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction
How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

97
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

932 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.40 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

194 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.040

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.24 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.00 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

306 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

346 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.009

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

461 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

346 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 93.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Alpine.js · 157 peers
You 93
·
Avg 80
+13 above average
0 50 100
Better than 87% of Alpine.js sites See full Alpine.js benchmark →
HSTS · 2715 peers
You 93
·
Avg 75
+18 above average
0 50 100
Security P98Content P98Accessibility P96Compliance P93Sustainability P93Performance P90SEO P87Infrastructure P71
Better than 98% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Alpine.js 3.15.9, hosted on OVH, with Nginx CDN

7 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Alpine.js 3.15.9HSTS Htmx 2.0.8 Open Graph Tailwind CSS
CDN
Nginx
Hosting
OVH

All Detected Technologies (7)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Hosting Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: dns14.ovh.net

Alpine.js is a minimal framework for composing behavior directly in your markup.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://alpinejs.dev Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://beavercheck.com/static/js/alpine.min.js?v=64cdf61

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Htmx is a JavaScript library for performing AJAX requests, triggering CSS transitions, and invoking WebSocket and server-sent events directly from HTML elements.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://htmx.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 167 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Alpine.js) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbeavercheck.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/beavercheck.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/beavercheck.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbeavercheck.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbeavercheck.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

1 sprints · 0h total → projected A (95)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → A (95)
  • · Unattributable: 322ms CPU time
  • · https://beavercheck.com/: 606ms CPU time

Send Feedback