Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-21 23:51 UTC
Worker
🇳🇱 Amsterdam
Duration
52.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

5 categories need attention: Security, and 4 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 15.3 MB (12.3 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Your LCP of 4.7s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 4.7s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$642 investment → $13,304/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$642
6.4 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$13,304
$159,647/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+24780% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6250.0 mo payback · +25444% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$42 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~36%.

Barriers
9
2 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+36pp
added vs baseline
Score
59
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 4.7s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 2.2s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 392ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$642 6.4 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$42 2 fixes in ~25 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$9,788 / month at risk ~$117,450 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$9,784 /mo

+36.4pp bounce · ~3,637 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$3.09 /mo

38658.5 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~3.9 MB per page load
    Saves $3.09/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

64
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
85
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
75
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.49 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.67 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

392 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.005

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.00 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

8.55 s

Desktop

88
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
85
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
75
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.26 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.70 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.003

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.68 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.71 s

Categories

8
Avg score 66.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Apple · 1280 peers
You 67
·
Avg 73
-6 below average
0 50 100
Compliance P2Sustainability P3Accessibility P6Content P8SEO P13Infrastructure P17Security P22Performance P55

Top 10% of Apple sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 1% of Apple sites See full Apple benchmark →
Facebook · 1424 peers
You 67
·
Avg 73
-6 below average
0 50 100
Compliance P2Sustainability P5Accessibility P7Content P7SEO P12Infrastructure P13Security P27Performance P57

Top 10% of Facebook sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Technology stack

Apple, on IIS, hosted on Microsoft IIS

8 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Apple Facebook Google Search Console Microsoft Microsoft 365 Windows Server
Server
IIS 10.0
Hosting
Microsoft IIS 10.0

All Detected Technologies (8)

Internet Information Services (IIS) is an extensible web server software created by Microsoft for use with the Windows NT family.

Categories Web servers Website https://www.iis.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Server Website https://www.iis.net Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Microsoft-IIS/10.0
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=zOB5E2GoL5MumNbG
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=4ab1xloaqvq5xo53dv4oghz6cruzmy
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=0ehkPFBnEl2sr31JsKevwPwxOKrGuc1e8cv3qNyur7E
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms84701248
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: honda-com.mail.protection.outlook.com

Windows Server is a brand name for a group of server operating systems.

Categories Operating systems Website https://microsoft.com/windowsserver Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

Server version exposed in headers

The Server header reveals 'IIS 10.0'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Apple) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhonda.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/honda.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/honda.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhonda.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhonda.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected C (77)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → C (74)
  • · Page weighs 15.3 MB (12.3 MB transferred)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → C (77)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback