Skip to content
https://playful-starlight-93aaa4.netlify.app Export & share
Scanned
2026-10-22 11:46 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Acceptable global latency — average 249ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (34ms), slowest from Singapore (464ms). Netlify edge cache ("Netlify Edge"; fwd=miss; fwd-status=200; stored).

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
305ms
DNS 32ms · TLS 29ms
United States - Santa Clara
140ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 5ms
United Stated - New York
34ms
DNS 6ms · TLS 9ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
270ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 11ms
Singapore - Singapore
464ms
DNS 6ms · TLS 3ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
283ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 4ms
CDN: Netlify ("Netlify Edge"; fwd=miss; fwd-status=200; stored) · Avg TTFB: 249ms · Cache: public,max-age=0,must-revalidate

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

playful-starlight-93aaa4.netlify.app fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Warning: 2

10 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3

Informational: a Permissions-Policy directive showing feature -> allowed origins.

Performance › CSS Performance Depth
Warning: 3

15 inline style attribute(s) detected

Inline style attributes force `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` in any CSP -- effectively negating CSP's XSS-mitigation value for stylesheets.

Security › CSP Inline-Style Readiness
Warning: 4

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

COOP isolates your top-level browsing context from cross-origin windows — without it, popup-based side-channel attacks remain possible.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. The 1 performance issue below shapes how fast users perceive your page. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your audience reach.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
1 performance issue — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$625 investment → $6,648/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$625
6.3 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$6,648
$79,770/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+12663% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$600 → 0.1 mo payback · +13195% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$25 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~19%.

Barriers
5
1 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+19pp
added vs baseline
Score
78
B
Speed
0
Trust
0
Usability
2
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • 1 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element
  • 2 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$625 6.3 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$25 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$6,648 / month at risk ~$79,770 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • 1 control(s) without accessible label
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$6,647 /mo

+19.0pp bounce · ~1,899 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 3.50

Bandwidth Waste

$0.31 /mo

3871.7 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~387 KB per page load
    Saves $0.31/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 1 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

76
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.70 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.15 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

32 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.538

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.75 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.29 s

Desktop

77
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

558 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

827 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.519

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.11 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

827 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 86.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Font API · 1433 peers
You 86
·
Avg 76
+10 above average
0 50 100
Security P97Accessibility P97Performance P87Sustainability P84Infrastructure P17Content P78SEO P32Compliance P35

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 83 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 97% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →
HSTS · 3319 peers
You 86
·
Avg 78
+8 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P89Infrastructure P13Security P82Performance P78Sustainability P75Content P71Compliance P34SEO P42

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 83 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 84% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Font API, with Netlify CDN

5 technologies detected 2 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Font API HSTS Open Graph
CDN
Netlify Netlify CDN

All Detected Technologies (5)

Netlify providers hosting and server-less backend services for web applications and static websites.

Categories PaaS, CDN Website https://www.netlify.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-nf-request-id, Server: Netlify, Domain: .netlify.app
Categories CDN Website https://www.netlify.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-nf-request-id: 01M5HPWC4N8HEK1ET5YKTTWNTS

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fplayful-starlight-93aaa4.netlify.app)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/playful-starlight-93aaa4.netlify.app)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/playful-starlight-93aaa4.netlify.app"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fplayful-starlight-93aaa4.netlify.app" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fplayful-starlight-93aaa4.netlify.app

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected A (91)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (88)
  • · 10 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3
  • · Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 6h → A (91)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
  • · 15 inline style attribute(s) detected

Send Feedback