Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-15 23:04 UTC
Worker
🇳🇱 Amsterdam
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Audit overview

5 categories need attention: Performance, and 4 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 13.3 MB (11.0 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

1 image-in-link without alt text

Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Your LCP of 20.0s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 20.0s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

CHF 878 investment → CHF 10,851/month returns + CHF 250,000 risk avoided

Investment
CHF 878
6.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
CHF 10’851
CHF 130’213/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+14739% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided CHF 250’000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
CHF 8130.1 mo payback · +15926% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
CHF 98 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~34%.

Barriers
10
3 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+34pp
added vs baseline
Score
49
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 20.0s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 17.5s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 6.9s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

CHF878 6.8 developer hours at CHF130/hr
Quick wins
CHF98 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

CHF /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

CHF 10’851 / month at risk ~CHF 130’213 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

CHF 250’000

nDSG/FADP
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    nDSG/FADP: CHF 1’000 – CHF 250’000

Bounce-Rate Cost

CHF 10’849 /mo

+33.9pp bounce · ~3,390 lost visitors/mo

CPC: CHF 3.20

Bandwidth Waste

CHF 2.45 /mo

34611.8 MB/mo × 0.071 CHF/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~3.5 MB per page load
    Saves CHF 2.45/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

12
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
92
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
73
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

10.58 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

20.05 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

6.87 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.259

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

10.58 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

26.96 s

Desktop

36
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
89
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
73
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.42 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.14 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.52 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.078

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.21 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.21 s

Categories

8
Avg score 68.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Apple · 1267 peers
You 67
·
Avg 73
-6 below average
0 50 100
Performance P8Content P8Sustainability P8Accessibility P13Infrastructure P17Security P22SEO P27Compliance P28

Top 10% of Apple sites score 84+ on Performance; you're at 67 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 1% of Apple sites See full Apple benchmark →
Google Search Console · 3817 peers
You 67
·
Avg 73
-6 below average
0 50 100
Sustainability P6Performance P7Content P10Infrastructure P14Accessibility P16SEO P26Security P30Compliance P31

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 90+ on Sustainability; you're at 56 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 1% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Apple, with Cloudflare CDN

9 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Facebook Pixel Tealium
Framework
Apple Google Search Console Microsoft Proofpoint Tealium Consent Management
CDN
Cloudflare F5 BigIP

All Detected Technologies (9)

Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare

F5's BIG-IP is a family of products covering software and hardware designed around application availability, access control, and security solutions.

Categories Reverse proxies Website https://www.f5.com/products/big-ip-services Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=nIH5NaTHSU6O7GKG
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=nJ7AalaXuwZQeNfgv-sSKaqJ1zujGJtFzzhfmZ1cJZ0
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms22036800
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: mxa-005f4701.gslb.pphosted.com

Tealium Consent Management adds consent and data privacy support.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://docs.tealium.com/platforms/getting-started/consent-management Detected by BeaverCheck

Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.

Categories Analytics Website https://facebook.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Tealium provides a sales enterprise tag management system and marketing software.

Categories Tag managers, Customer data platform Website https://tealium.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Apple) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

9 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fswiss.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/67a44cea-af80-4c0f-9866-0926e21f3356)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/67a44cea-af80-4c0f-9866-0926e21f3356"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fswiss.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fswiss.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected C (77)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (74)
  • · Page weighs 13.3 MB (11.0 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 1 image-in-link without alt text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → C (77)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback