Skip to content
Scanned
2026-08-18 00:43 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Excellent global latency — average 37ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (12ms), slowest from Madrid (135ms). Akamai in front. Cache-Control header is missing.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
135ms
DNS 31ms · TLS 52ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
12ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 6ms
United Stated - New York
28ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 12ms
United States - Santa Clara
18ms
DNS 6ms · TLS 6ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
16ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 6ms
Singapore - Singapore
15ms
DNS 4ms · TLS 6ms
CDN: Akamai · Avg TTFB: 37ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 19.9 MB (8.5 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)

Missing <html lang> attribute -- screen readers default to the user's system language and pronounce content with the wrong phonetics.

Accessibility › Document Language
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 13.6s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 13.6s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$633 investment → $12,236/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$633
6.3 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$12,236
$146,831/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+23084% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6250.1 mo payback · +23393% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$33 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~40%.

Barriers
10
4 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+40pp
added vs baseline
Score
42
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 13.6s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 11.1s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.6s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$633 6.3 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$33 2 fixes in ~20 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$10,737 / month at risk ~$128,839 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$10,734 /mo

+39.9pp bounce · ~3,991 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$2.13 /mo

26636.9 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~2.7 MB per page load
    Saves $2.13/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

17
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
78
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
83
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.34 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

13.55 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.58 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.281

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

9.87 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

30.62 s

Desktop

50
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
71
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
83
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.02 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.28 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

130 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.510

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.87 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.71 s

Categories

8
Avg score 75.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Apple · 1292 peers
You 78
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P98Accessibility P92Sustainability P23SEO P28Performance P69Content P38Infrastructure P51

Top 10% of Apple sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 61 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 87% of Apple sites See full Apple benchmark →
Facebook · 1435 peers
You 78
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P98Accessibility P94Sustainability P25Performance P71SEO P30Content P36Infrastructure P45

Top 10% of Facebook sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 61 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 89% of Facebook sites See full Facebook benchmark →

Technology stack

Apple

6 technologies detected 1 stack layers Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Apple Facebook Google Search Console HTTP/3 Microsoft Proofpoint

All Detected Technologies (6)

Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=TtT64EdjSevURGEI
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=79esg7n82tq8cwyisaodmgi937dpc9
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=WnK3OGXPzf93OkYzb0r4cFg0BMyZXVj0Izffi_B1gx0

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms15146138
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: mx0a-001bf601.pphosted.com

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Apple) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnba.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/nba.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/nba.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnba.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnba.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected B (86)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → B (85)
  • · Page weighs 19.9 MB (8.5 MB transferred)
  • · Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (86)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback