Skip to content
https://romanaedile.com Export & share
Scanned
2026-10-20 16:28 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.2m
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

High global latency — average 3217ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (529ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (5760ms). No CDN (document or assets). Cache-Control header is missing. 6 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
638ms
DNS 63ms · TLS 46ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
529ms
DNS 66ms · TLS 34ms
United Stated - New York
1023ms
DNS 210ms · TLS 101ms
United States - Santa Clara
5628ms
DNS 351ms · TLS 161ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
5760ms
DNS 423ms · TLS 211ms
Singapore - Singapore
5726ms
DNS 518ms · TLS 156ms
CDN: No CDN (document or assets) · Avg TTFB: 3217ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Page weighs 12.8 MB (10.9 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 3

2 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 4

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Warning: 5

17 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3

Informational: a Permissions-Policy directive showing feature -> allowed origins.

Performance › CSS Performance Depth
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 46.7s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 46.7s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€202 investment → €3,115/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€202
3.7 h · 3 findings
Monthly returns
€3.115
€37.386/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+18438% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€202 → 0.1 mo payback · +18438% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€37 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
7
2 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
65
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
2
Content
0
Nav
2
  • Page takes 46.7s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 44.2s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 3 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 315ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Layout shifts during page load
    Content movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields
    → Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€202 3.7 developer hours at €55/hr
Quick wins
€37 2 fixes in ~40 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

€ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€3.115 / month at risk ~€37.386 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • No <main> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • 4 of 4 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€3.113 /mo

+29.0pp bounce · ~2,898 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 1.07

Bandwidth Waste

€2,55 /mo

34424.7 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~3.4 MB per page load
    Saves €2,55/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

50
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
80
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.87 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

46.71 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

315 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.123

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

11.07 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

47.84 s

Desktop

56
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
80
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

895 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

6.67 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

4 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.226

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.91 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

6.71 s

Categories

8
Avg score 80.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

WooCommerce · 229 peers
You 82
·
Avg 79
At average
0 50 100
Better than 66% of WooCommerce sites See full WooCommerce benchmark →
WordPress · 1065 peers
You 82
·
Avg 76
+6 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P15Sustainability P15Security P79Accessibility P78SEO P77Performance P67Content P47Infrastructure P49

Top 10% of WordPress sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 68 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 79% of WordPress sites See full WordPress benchmark →

Technology stack

WordPress 6.8.2, on LiteSpeed/PHP

23 technologies detected 6 stack layers 6 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager Site Kit 1.190.0 Yoast SEO
Ecommerce
WooCommerce
CMS
WordPress 6.8.2
Framework
Flickity Google Font API HSTS HTTP/3 Isotope Masonry Modernizr 2.6.2 MySQL Open Graph RSS Slick jQuery 3.7.1 jQuery Migrate 3.4.1 jQuery UI 1.13.3parallax.js 3.5.2
Runtime
PHP
Server
LiteSpeed

All Detected Technologies (23)

LiteSpeed is a high-scalability web server.

Categories Web servers Website https://litespeedtech.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: LiteSpeed
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.

Categories CMS, Blogs Website https://wordpress.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://romanaedile.com/wp-content/plugins/be-gdpr/public/js/be-gdpr-public.js?ver=1.1.6, Script URL: https://romanaedile.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js?ver=3.7.1, Link URL: https://romanaedile.com/wp-content/themes/spyro/fonts/icons.css?ver=1.1.4, Header link contains wp-json
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Ecommerce Website https://woocommerce.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Body: woocommerce class/marker present

Flickity is a JavaScript slider library, built by David DeSandro of Metafizzy fame.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://flickity.metafizzy.co Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Isotope.js is a JavaScript library that makes it easy to sort, filter, and add Masonry layouts to items on a webpage.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://isotope.metafizzy.co Detected by BeaverCheck

Masonry is a JavaScript library that enables a cascading grid layout, positioning elements based on available vertical space for an optimized, gap-free arrangement.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://masonry.desandro.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Modernizr is a JavaScript library that detects the features available in a user's browser.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://modernizr.com Detected by BeaverCheck

MySQL is an open-source relational database management system.

Categories Databases Website https://mysql.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://kenwheeler.github.io/slick Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://romanaedile.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js?ver=3.7.1, Script URL: https://romanaedile.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=3.4.1
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Query Migrate is a javascript library that allows you to preserve the compatibility of your jQuery code developed for versions of jQuery older than 1.9.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/jquery/jquery-migrate Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery UI is a collection of GUI widgets, animated visual effects, and themes implemented with jQuery, Cascading Style Sheets, and HTML.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jqueryui.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Simple parallax scrolling effect.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/pixelcog/parallax.js Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=GT-T53QKZGW&cx=c&gtm=4e6aj0

Site Kit is a one-stop solution for WordPress users to use everything Google has to offer to make them successful on the web.

Categories Analytics, WordPress plugins Website https://sitekit.withgoogle.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Yoast SEO is a search engine optimisation plugin for WordPress and other platforms.

Categories SEO, WordPress plugins Website https://yoast.com/wordpress/plugins/seo/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

WordPress detected — review security configuration

WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Flickity) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

23 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fromanaedile.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/romanaedile.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/romanaedile.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fromanaedile.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fromanaedile.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 4h total → projected A (91)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → B (88)
  • · Page weighs 12.8 MB (10.9 MB transferred)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · 2 link(s) with no accessible text
  • · 17 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 3h → A (91)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback