Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
75
TTFB stable →
113ms
FCP stable →
1.1s
LCP stable →
5.3s
Scanned
2026-05-10 11:14 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
43.00s
Vs prev
Improved by +5

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 492ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (57ms), slowest from Singapore (2183ms). No CDN detected. 1 location above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
113ms
DNS 40ms · TLS 5ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
57ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 9ms
United States - Santa Clara
383ms
DNS 5ms · TLS 87ms
United Stated - New York
66ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 6ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
152ms
DNS 2ms · TLS 5ms
Singapore - Singapore
2183ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 1615ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 492ms · Cache: private

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

5

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

0

High impact, requires investment.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Cookie 'MUIDB' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 2

Cookie 'SRCHD' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

Cookie 'SRCHHPGUSR' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 4

Cookie 'SRCHUID' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 5

Cookie 'SRCHUSR' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
5 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$125 investment → $11,721/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$125
1.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$11,721
$140,649/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+112419% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$750.0 mo payback · +187431% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
8
1 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
69
C
Speed
1
Trust
1
Usability
2
Content
2
Nav
2
  • Page takes 5.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 2.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Layout shifts during page load
    Content movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields
    → Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds
  • 1 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$125 1.3 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$125 5 fixes in ~75 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

$20,858 / month at risk ~$250,300 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • 11 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • 1 advertising/retargeting trackers detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • 3 tracking cookie(s) set before consent interaction
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No headings found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • 1 control(s) without accessible label
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$7,733 /mo

+28.7pp bounce · ~2,875 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.18 /mo

2280.8 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~228 KB per page load
    Saves $0.18/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

75
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
92
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
73
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.12 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.29 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

164 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.102

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.53 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.30 s

Desktop

81
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
69
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

391 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

640 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

183 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.208

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.91 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.61 s

Categories

8
Avg score 78.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

HSTS · 2430 peers
You 80
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Accessibility P92Security P83Performance P80SEO P32Sustainability P56Infrastructure P47Content P50

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 53 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 85% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →
HTTP/3 · 1402 peers
You 80
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Accessibility P93Security P84Performance P76Infrastructure P36SEO P42Sustainability P43Content P53

Top 10% of HTTP/3 sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 53 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 87% of HTTP/3 sites See full HTTP/3 benchmark →

Technology stack

HSTS

5 technologies detected 2 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Microsoft Advertising
Framework
HSTS HTTP/3 Open Graph Priority Hints

All Detected Technologies (5)

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Microsoft Advertising is an online advertising platform developed by Microsoft.

Categories Advertising Website https://ads.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bing.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/6a8e113f-8cae-4d1a-9ca0-d7651fd8e895)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/6a8e113f-8cae-4d1a-9ca0-d7651fd8e895"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bing.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bing.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

1 sprints · 1h total → projected B (86)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

5 findings 1h → B (86)
  • · Cookie 'MUIDB' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie 'SRCHD' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie 'SRCHHPGUSR' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie 'SRCHUID' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie 'SRCHUSR' is missing the Secure flag

Send Feedback