Skip to content
Scanned
2026-07-20 17:29 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
1.3m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 416ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (80ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (959ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 2 locations above the 500ms target.

United States - Santa Clara
Full audit
503ms
DNS 45ms · TLS 154ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
80ms
DNS 26ms · TLS 19ms
Spain - Madrid
186ms
DNS 77ms · TLS 52ms
United Stated - New York
280ms
DNS 14ms · TLS 94ms
Singapore - Singapore
487ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 162ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
959ms
DNS 334ms · TLS 213ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 416ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Warning: 3

128 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener

target="_blank" without rel="noopener" lets the destination tab navigate the original via window.opener -- a reverse-tabnabbing phishing primitive.

Security › Cross-Origin Tab Safety
Warning: 4

3 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
Warning: 5

33 third-party resources (51% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 3.5s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 3.5s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€743 investment → €7,052/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€743
8.3 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€7.052
€84.625/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+11297% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5630.1 mo payback · +14944% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€23 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~25%.

Barriers
7
2 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+25pp
added vs baseline
Score
65
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
0
Nav
2
  • Page feels frozen for 1.2s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 35 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • Page loads in 3.5s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 983ms over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€743 8.3 developer hours at €90/hr
Quick wins
€23 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€5.538 / month at risk ~€66.453 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • No <nav> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Heading level skipped: H1 → H3 (missing H2)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€5.538 /mo

+25.2pp bounce · ~2,517 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,21 /mo

2880.4 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~288 KB per page load
    Saves €0,21/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

56
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.55 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.48 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.16 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.176

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.89 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

8.98 s

Desktop

65
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
98
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.42 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.59 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

172 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.396

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.49 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.82 s

Categories

8
Avg score 82.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 3916 peers
You 82
·
Avg 73
+9 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P95SEO P89Security P85Performance P80Infrastructure P27Sustainability P66Content P43Compliance P57

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 85 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 93% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
HSTS · 2639 peers
You 82
·
Avg 75
+7 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P90SEO P87Infrastructure P23Security P74Performance P72Content P41Compliance P59Sustainability P59

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 85 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 87% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console, on IIS/ASP.NET, hosted on GoDaddy

14 technologies detected 5 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Framework
Google Search Console HSTS Microsoft ASP.NET Open Graph Priority Hints W3.CSS Windows Server jQuery 3.7.1
Runtime
ASP.NET
Server
IIS 10.0
Hosting
GoDaddy Microsoft IIS 10.0

All Detected Technologies (14)

Categories Hosting Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence NS record: ns77.domaincontrol.com

Internet Information Services (IIS) is an extensible web server software created by Microsoft for use with the Windows NT family.

Categories Web servers Website https://www.iis.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Server Website https://www.iis.net Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Microsoft-IIS/10.0
Categories Runtime Website https://dotnet.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-powered-by: ASP.NET
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=JgGUe9QsQ_9bkkfUeDGSI2mbPYS0DDQh2au4j8Si62c

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

ASP.NET is an open-source, server-side web-application framework designed for web development to produce dynamic web pages.

Categories Web frameworks Website https://www.asp.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

W3.CSS is a CSS framework developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), the main international standards organisation for the World Wide Web.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://www.w3schools.com/w3css/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Windows Server is a brand name for a group of server operating systems.

Categories Operating systems Website https://microsoft.com/windowsserver Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-BPVEZPSHK9&cx=c&gtm=4e67g0

Observations (3)

Server version exposed in headers

The Server header reveals 'IIS 10.0'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

14 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.eurovoyages.net)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/eurovoyages.net)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/eurovoyages.net"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.eurovoyages.net" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.eurovoyages.net

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (84)
  • · 33 third-party resources (51% of weight)
  • · 128 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → B (89)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · 3 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Send Feedback