Skip to content
Scanned
2026-07-25 11:28 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
51.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 604ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (52ms), slowest from Amsterdam (3070ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC). Cache-Control header is missing. 1 location above the 500ms target.

United States - Santa Clara
Full audit
66ms
DNS 13ms · TLS 11ms
Singapore - Singapore
87ms
DNS 18ms · TLS 16ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
226ms
DNS 187ms · TLS 8ms
Spain - Madrid
125ms
DNS 42ms · TLS 23ms
United Stated - New York
52ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 11ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
3070ms
DNS 3025ms · TLS 11ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 604ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 14.3 MB (14.2 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 36.8s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 36.8s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$675 investment → $6,624/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$675
6.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$6,624
$79,493/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+11677% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6250.1 mo payback · +12619% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$75 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~25%.

Barriers
6
1 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+25pp
added vs baseline
Score
75
B
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 36.8s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 34.3s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$675 6.8 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$75 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$6,624 / month at risk ~$79,493 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$6,621 /mo

+24.6pp bounce · ~2,461 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$3.57 /mo

44609.8 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~4.5 MB per page load
    Saves $3.57/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

60
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.01 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

36.83 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

103 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.023

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.68 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

39.17 s

Desktop

77
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.07 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.51 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

48 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.042

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.13 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

10.64 s

Categories

8
Avg score 80.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Astro · 59 peers
You 82
·
Avg 77
At average
0 50 100
Better than 83% of Astro sites See full Astro benchmark →
Google Font API · 1068 peers
You 82
·
Avg 74
+8 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P2Security P98SEO P97Accessibility P89Performance P85Infrastructure P26Sustainability P29Content P68

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 94% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →

Technology stack

Astro, with Cloudflare CDN

6 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Astro Google Font API Google Search Console HTTP/3 Open Graph
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (6)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Astro is a new JavaScript-based static site builder.

Categories Static site generator, JavaScript frameworks Website https://astro.build Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=cK1fkZLUoUztafWzktFKsjPNHMPTTQ_4aHJBlc9qCBk

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Astro) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fthebalkanchronicle.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/thebalkanchronicle.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/thebalkanchronicle.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fthebalkanchronicle.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fthebalkanchronicle.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected A (91)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (89)
  • · Page weighs 14.3 MB (14.2 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → A (91)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback