Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
24
TTFB stable →
123ms
FCP stable →
2.0s
LCP stable →
8.1s
Scanned
2026-04-17 12:59 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
56.00s
Vs prev
no change

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Strong global performance — average 122ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (44ms), slowest from Singapore (246ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store).

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
123ms
DNS 48ms · TLS 5ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
44ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 9ms
United Stated - New York
108ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 6ms
United States - Santa Clara
64ms
DNS 5ms · TLS 6ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
150ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 5ms
Singapore - Singapore
246ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 44ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 122ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Security, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Cookie 'MUIDB' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

Cookie '_C_Auth' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 4

Cookie '_EDGE_S' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 5

Cookie '_EDGE_V' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. The 5 security gaps leave your users exposed — modern browsers increasingly warn visitors about insecure sites. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
5 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€320 investment → €12,551/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€320
4.0 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€12.551
€150.613/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+46967% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€2800.0 mo payback · +53690% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€80 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~34%.

Barriers
9
4 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+34pp
added vs baseline
Score
45
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
2
Nav
2
  • Page takes 8.1s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 5.6s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.8s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • 4 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€320 4.0 developer hours at €80/hr
Quick wins
€80 4 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€7.575 / month at risk ~€90.901 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveRGPDEAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • 1 advertising/retargeting trackers detected
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    RGPD: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€7.575 /mo

+34.4pp bounce · ~3,443 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,54 /mo

7224.9 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~722 KB per page load
    Saves €0,54/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

24
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
91
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
73
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.96 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

8.08 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.85 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.450

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.75 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

16.06 s

Desktop

58
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
69
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

537 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.04 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

411 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.057

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.90 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.94 s

Categories

8
Avg score 71.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

HSTS · 2556 peers
You 68
·
Avg 75
-7 below average
0 50 100
Security P1Compliance P14Sustainability P18Infrastructure P23Performance P31SEO P35Accessibility P37Content P43

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 82+ on Security; you're at 53 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 1% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →
Microsoft ASP.NET · 119 peers
You 68
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Better than 3% of Microsoft ASP.NET sites See full Microsoft ASP.NET benchmark →

Technology stack

HSTS, hosted on Azure

8 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Azure Monitor Microsoft Advertising
Framework
HSTS Microsoft ASP.NET OneTrust Open Graph
Hosting
Azure Kestrel

All Detected Technologies (8)

Azure is a cloud computing service for building, testing, deploying, and managing applications and services through Microsoft-managed data centers.

Categories PaaS Website https://azure.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Web servers Website https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/servers/kestrel Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

ASP.NET is an open-source, server-side web-application framework designed for web development to produce dynamic web pages.

Categories Web frameworks Website https://www.asp.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

OneTrust is a cloud-based data privacy management compliance platform.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://www.onetrust.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Azure Monitor collects monitoring telemetry from a variety of on-premises and Azure sources. Azure Monitor helps you maximise the availability and performance of your applications and services.

Categories Analytics, Performance Website https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/monitor Detected by BeaverCheck

Microsoft Advertising is an online advertising platform developed by Microsoft.

Categories Advertising Website https://ads.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.msn.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/6d04ee3c-c8b1-4f76-9a04-74f234828438)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/6d04ee3c-c8b1-4f76-9a04-74f234828438"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.msn.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.msn.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 4h total → projected C (76)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+8

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → C (76)
  • · Cookie 'MUIDB' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie '_C_Auth' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie '_EDGE_S' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie '_EDGE_V' is missing the Secure flag

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 3h → C (76)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback