Skip to content
US · USD ($) · Estimated Applicable regulations: CCPA/CPRA · ADA Title III Dev cost: $100/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Recent Trends
Performance improving ↑
80
TTFB degrading ↓
421ms
FCP improving ↑
1.4s
LCP improving ↑
2.0s
Scanned
2026-11-07 12:42 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.2m
Vs prev
Improved by +1

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

piccap.co fails 1 mail check: DMARC policy is none — monitoring only. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Page weighs 7.3 MB (5.7 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Warning: 2

97 inline style attribute(s) detected

Inline style attributes force `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` in any CSP -- effectively negating CSP's XSS-mitigation value for stylesheets.

Security › CSP Inline-Style Readiness
Warning: 3

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 4

DMARC policy is none — monitoring only

DMARC p=none collects reports but doesn't actually block spoofed mail — phishing emails still reach inboxes.

Security › Email Security
Warning: 5

HSTS is enabled but missing includeSubDomains

Without includeSubDomains, a forgotten dev subdomain over HTTP can set malicious cookies that ride to the apex.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Your LCP of 5.9s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your conversion rate.
Your LCP is 5.9s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$575 investment → $8,702/month returns

Investment
$575
5.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$8,702
$104,418/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+18060% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$550 → 0.1 mo payback · +18885% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$75 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

2 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~22%.

Barriers
2
2 crit
Bounce delta
+22pp
added vs baseline
Score
80
B
Speed
2
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
0
  • Page takes 5.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 674ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$575 5.8 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$75 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$5,820 / month at risk ~$69,836 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

$5,818 /mo

+21.6pp bounce · ~2,163 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$1.42 /mo

17773.6 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.8 MB per page load
    Saves $1.42/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 1 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

52
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.09 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.89 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

674 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.09 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.96 s

Desktop

89
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.08 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.82 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

63 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.50 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.97 s

Categories

8
Avg score 86.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 4610 peers
You 87
·
Avg 75
+12 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P94Security P93Content P81Compliance P22Performance P75Infrastructure P73SEO P69Sustainability P58

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 73 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 91% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
HSTS · 3637 peers
You 87
·
Avg 78
+9 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P90Security P86Content P79Infrastructure P72Compliance P30SEO P63Performance P62Sustainability P47

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 87+ on Compliance; you're at 73 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 85% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console, with Cloudflare CDN

11 technologies detected 2 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Search Console HSTS HTTP/3 MobX Open Graph PWA React React Router 7.15.1 Sentry Tailwind CSS
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (11)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=MUyWfbXP-B2-lOg9kd2Quaqh7REtAKQatrfqvR0dGRE

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://mobx.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) are web apps built and enhanced with modern APIs to deliver enhanced capabilities, reliability, and installability while reaching anyone, anywhere, on any device, all with a single codebase.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://web.dev/progressive-web-apps/ Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

React Router provides declarative routing for React.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactrouter.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Sentry is an open-source platform for workflow productivity, aggregating errors from across the stack in real time.

Categories Issue trackers Website https://sentry.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 201 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpiccap.co)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/piccap.co)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/piccap.co"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpiccap.co" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpiccap.co

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected A (92)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → A (91)
  • · Page weighs 7.3 MB (5.7 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS is enabled but missing includeSubDomains
  • · DMARC policy is none — monitoring only

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 5h → A (92)
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
  • · 97 inline style attribute(s) detected

Send Feedback