Skip to content

Global Performance

5/5 locations

High global latency — average 1255ms across 5 locations, fastest from New York (380ms), slowest from Madrid (2132ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 4 locations above the 500ms target.

United States - Santa Clara
Full audit
848ms
DNS 13ms · TLS 149ms
United Stated - New York
380ms
DNS 133ms · TLS 30ms
Singapore - Singapore
1738ms
DNS 14ms · TLS 8ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1178ms
DNS 16ms · TLS 10ms
Spain - Madrid
2132ms
DNS 41ms · TLS 41ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 1255ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

Compliance and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Warning: 4

1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
Warning: 5

17 third-party resources (89% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 4.4s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 4.4s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$817 investment → $12,582/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$817
8.2 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$12,582
$150,982/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+18388% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6170.0 mo payback · +24384% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$17 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~35%.

Barriers
7
2 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+35pp
added vs baseline
Score
65
C
Speed
1
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 4.4s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 1.9s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$817 8.2 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$17 1 fixes in ~10 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$9,399 / month at risk ~$112,789 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • 2 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • 3 tracking-shaped cross-site cookie(s): x-ms-cpim-cache|6rr8x7ikzewdhpa7yplj1q_0, x-ms-cpim-csrf, x-ms-cpim-trans
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$9,399 /mo

+34.9pp bounce · ~3,494 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.17 /mo

2146.2 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~215 KB per page load
    Saves $0.17/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

82
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
88
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
73
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.93 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.45 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

86 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.80 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.45 s

Desktop

93
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
92
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
73
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

815 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.54 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.050

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.23 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.54 s

Categories

8
Avg score 76.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Handlebars · 40 peers
You 79
·
Avg 71
+8 above average
0 50 100
Better than 97% of Handlebars sites See full Handlebars benchmark →
HSTS · 2556 peers
You 79
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Infrastructure P2Accessibility P87Security P85Performance P84Sustainability P80SEO P22Content P28

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 53 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 77% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

HSTS, hosted on Azure

4 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
HSTS Handlebars 4.0.12 jQuery 3.4.1
Hosting
Azure

All Detected Technologies (4)

Azure is a cloud computing service for building, testing, deploying, and managing applications and services through Microsoft-managed data centers.

Categories PaaS Website https://azure.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Handlebars is a JavaScript library used to create reusable webpage templates.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://handlebarsjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Finsightcenter.b2clogin.com%2Finsightcenter.onmicrosoft.com%2Fb2c_1a_ss_si%2Foauth2%2Fv2.0%2Fauthorize%3Fclient_id%3Db1cf1b94-be82-4e12-a3ef-23c9154c772b%26scope%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Finsightcenter.onmicrosoft.com%252Feservice-api-prd%252Fuser_impersonation%2520openid%2520profile%2520offline_access%26redirect_uri%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fservice.stryker.com%252FloginSSO%26client-request-id%3D019eb605-6af2-7793-98db-bf244f7a8554%26response_mode%3Dfragment%26response_type%3Dcode%26x-client-SKU%3Dmsal.js.browser%26x-client-VER%3D3.30.0%26client_info%3D1%26code_challenge%3DBRub9pEd4Ln2tN_VOD8VCubek0OyYIqUDzff1E1zHMo%26code_challenge_method%3DS256%26nonce%3D019eb605-6af5-7490-9771-b2ecca73ccf4%26state%3DeyJpZCI6IjAxOWViNjA1LTZhZjQtN2ZhZC1iZjQ3LWMzYmE1MmVjYjZiNyIsIm1ldGEiOnsiaW50ZXJhY3Rpb25UeXBlIjoicmVkaXJlY3QifX0%253D)](https://beavercheck.com/results/700609fa-b85f-454b-b892-1759ba88a903)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/700609fa-b85f-454b-b892-1759ba88a903"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Finsightcenter.b2clogin.com%2Finsightcenter.onmicrosoft.com%2Fb2c_1a_ss_si%2Foauth2%2Fv2.0%2Fauthorize%3Fclient_id%3Db1cf1b94-be82-4e12-a3ef-23c9154c772b%26scope%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Finsightcenter.onmicrosoft.com%252Feservice-api-prd%252Fuser_impersonation%2520openid%2520profile%2520offline_access%26redirect_uri%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fservice.stryker.com%252FloginSSO%26client-request-id%3D019eb605-6af2-7793-98db-bf244f7a8554%26response_mode%3Dfragment%26response_type%3Dcode%26x-client-SKU%3Dmsal.js.browser%26x-client-VER%3D3.30.0%26client_info%3D1%26code_challenge%3DBRub9pEd4Ln2tN_VOD8VCubek0OyYIqUDzff1E1zHMo%26code_challenge_method%3DS256%26nonce%3D019eb605-6af5-7490-9771-b2ecca73ccf4%26state%3DeyJpZCI6IjAxOWViNjA1LTZhZjQtN2ZhZC1iZjQ3LWMzYmE1MmVjYjZiNyIsIm1ldGEiOnsiaW50ZXJhY3Rpb25UeXBlIjoicmVkaXJlY3QifX0%253D" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Finsightcenter.b2clogin.com%2Finsightcenter.onmicrosoft.com%2Fb2c_1a_ss_si%2Foauth2%2Fv2.0%2Fauthorize%3Fclient_id%3Db1cf1b94-be82-4e12-a3ef-23c9154c772b%26scope%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Finsightcenter.onmicrosoft.com%252Feservice-api-prd%252Fuser_impersonation%2520openid%2520profile%2520offline_access%26redirect_uri%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fservice.stryker.com%252FloginSSO%26client-request-id%3D019eb605-6af2-7793-98db-bf244f7a8554%26response_mode%3Dfragment%26response_type%3Dcode%26x-client-SKU%3Dmsal.js.browser%26x-client-VER%3D3.30.0%26client_info%3D1%26code_challenge%3DBRub9pEd4Ln2tN_VOD8VCubek0OyYIqUDzff1E1zHMo%26code_challenge_method%3DS256%26nonce%3D019eb605-6af5-7490-9771-b2ecca73ccf4%26state%3DeyJpZCI6IjAxOWViNjA1LTZhZjQtN2ZhZC1iZjQ3LWMzYmE1MmVjYjZiNyIsIm1ldGEiOnsiaW50ZXJhY3Rpb25UeXBlIjoicmVkaXJlY3QifX0%253D

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (88)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (82)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · 17 third-party resources (89% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+6

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → B (88)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · 1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Send Feedback