Skip to content
https://transip.eu Export & share
EU · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: GDPR · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €85/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 20:46 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Audit overview

Accessibility and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Warning: 3

31 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 4

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

COOP isolates your top-level browsing context from cross-origin windows — without it, popup-based side-channel attacks remain possible.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 6.3s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 6.3s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€616 investment → €5,985/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€616
7.3 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€5.985
€71.814/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+11553% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5950.1 mo payback · +11970% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€21 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.

Barriers
6
2 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+27pp
added vs baseline
Score
68
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
1
  • Page takes 6.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 50 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 345ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€616 7.3 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€21 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€2.876 / month at risk ~€34.510 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • Heading level skipped: H1 → H3 (missing H2)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€2.876 /mo

+26.8pp bounce · ~2,677 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 1.07

Bandwidth Waste

€0,30 /mo

4065.5 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~407 KB per page load
    Saves €0,30/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

62
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.08 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

6.31 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

345 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.033

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.31 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

10.39 s

Desktop

93
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

815 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.52 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

10 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.012

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.41 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.29 s

Categories

8
Avg score 79.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cart Functionality · 554 peers
You 78
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P98Content P4Performance P86Infrastructure P86SEO P17Sustainability P83Accessibility P80Security P71

Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 95+ on Content; you're at 61 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 85% of Cart Functionality sites See full Cart Functionality benchmark →
AccessiBe · 21 peers
You 78
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Better than 80% of AccessiBe sites See full AccessiBe benchmark →

Technology stack

AccessiBe, with Nginx CDN

9 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Ecommerce
Cart Functionality
Framework
AccessiBe HSTS RSS core-js 3.49.0 iubenda lit-element 4.2.0 lit-html 3.3.0
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (9)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.

Categories Ecommerce Website https://www.wappalyzer.com/technologies/ecommerce/cart-functionality Detected by BeaverCheck

AccessiBe is an accessibility overlay which claims to provide ADA and WCAG compliance. The system scans and analyzes a website, and applies adjustments which they claim make your website ADA and WCAG 2.1 compliant.

Categories Accessibility Website https://accessibe.com Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

iubenda is a compliance software used by businesses for their websites and apps.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://www.iubenda.com Detected by BeaverCheck

lit-element is a simple base class for creating web components that work in any web page with any framework. lit-element uses lit-html to render into shadow DOM, and adds API to manage properties and attributes.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://lit.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

lit-html is a simple, modern, safe, small and fast HTML templating library for JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://lit.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (AccessiBe) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

9 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftransip.eu)](https://beavercheck.com/results/702e6620-8838-432f-9eb5-82f757f74b07)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/702e6620-8838-432f-9eb5-82f757f74b07"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftransip.eu" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftransip.eu

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (84)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (80)
  • · 31 third-party resources (100% of weight)
  • · Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → B (84)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback