Skip to content
https://dontwordle.app Export & share
Scanned
2026-07-31 07:16 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
30.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Strong global performance — average 195ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (79ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (402ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC).

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
167ms
DNS 37ms · TLS 25ms
United States - Santa Clara
187ms
DNS 63ms · TLS 14ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
402ms
DNS 120ms · TLS 38ms
Singapore - Singapore
259ms
DNS 16ms · TLS 11ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
79ms
DNS 19ms · TLS 10ms
United Stated - New York
80ms
DNS 21ms · TLS 15ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 195ms · Cache: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Warning: 2

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 3

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

COOP isolates your top-level browsing context from cross-origin windows — without it, popup-based side-channel attacks remain possible.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 4

No DMARC record found

Without DMARC, anyone can send phishing emails using your domain name.

Security › Email Security
Warning: 5

No SPF record found

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Email Security
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
5 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€744 investment → €531/month returns

Investment
€744
8.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€531
€6.375/yr
Payback
1.4 mo
+757% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€6161.2 mo payback · +934% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€64 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

1 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~2%.

Barriers
1
1 warn
Bounce delta
+2pp
added vs baseline
Score
97
A+
Speed
0
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
0
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€744 8.8 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€64 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€531 / month at risk ~€6.375 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

€531 /mo

+1.6pp bounce · ~164 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 3.24

Bandwidth Waste

€0,04 /mo

508.8 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~51 KB per page load
    Saves €0,04/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 1 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
92
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

948 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.10 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.20 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.10 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
92
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

306 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

346 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

462 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

346 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 91.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Astro · 60 peers
You 92
·
Avg 77
+15 above average
0 50 100
Better than 98% of Astro sites See full Astro benchmark →
Google Search Console · 3966 peers
You 92
·
Avg 74
+18 above average
0 50 100
Performance P99SEO P99Security P98Accessibility P98Sustainability P93Content P86Infrastructure P74Compliance P32

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 75 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 99% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Astro, with Cloudflare CDN

7 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Astro Google Search Console HSTS HTTP/3 Lucide Open Graph
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (7)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Astro is a new JavaScript-based static site builder.

Categories Static site generator, JavaScript frameworks Website https://astro.build Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=Mld5WDDen59ZHMT7EG8DOaX0HPfyoSSs51T-TOB5frE

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides 1000+ vector (svg) files for displaying icons and symbols in digital and non-digital projects.

Categories Font scripts Website https://lucide.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Astro) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdontwordle.app)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/dontwordle.app)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/dontwordle.app"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdontwordle.app" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdontwordle.app

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 9h total → projected A (94)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → A (94)
  • · Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing
  • · No SPF record found

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 2h → A (94)
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
  • · No DMARC record found

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

Higher effort, long-term payoff

1 findings 6h → A (94)
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback