Audit overview
6 categories need attention: Performance, and 5 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
Page weighs 22.8 MB (7.4 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
3 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
₩472,500 investment → ₩4,404,466/month returns + KRW 3,000,000,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~32%.
- Page takes 8.4s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 5.9s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 2.0sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- Layout shifts during page loadContent movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields→ Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
₩3,000,000,000
- No privacy policy link detectedPIPA: KRW 1,000,000 – KRW 3,000,000,000
- 2 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedPIPA: KRW 1,000,000 – KRW 3,000,000,000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundPIPA: KRW 1,000,000 – KRW 3,000,000,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
₩2,528,482 /mo
+31.6pp bounce · ~3,161 lost visitors/mo
CPC: KRW 800.00
Bandwidth Waste
₩2,519 /mo
23298.2 MB/mo × 108.108 KRW/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~2.3 MB per page loadSaves ₩2,519/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
7.55 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
8.36 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
1.98 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.152
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
22.77 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
37.90 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.76 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
3.76 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
32 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.046
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
7.18 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
6.64 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 22.8 MB (7.4 MB transferred)
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
3 link(s) with no accessible text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 87+ on Performance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Funding Choices, with F5 BigIP CDN
Stack Architecture
Beusable 
DoubleClick Floodlight 
Google Analytics 
Google Publisher Tag 
Google Tag Manager 
Funding Choices 
Google Font API 
Kakao 1.40.14Microsoft 
RSS 
Slick 
Swiper 
YouTube 
jQuery 3.7.0
jQuery UI 1.13.2
F5 BigIP All Detected Technologies (16)
F5's BIG-IP is a family of products covering software and hardware designed around application availability, access control, and security solutions.
Funding Choices is a messaging tool that can help you comply with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and recover lost revenue from ad blocking users.
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
Kakao platform provides various services such as Kakao Talk, Kakao Talk Channel, Kakao Story as well as Kakao Pay, Kakao Commerce, Kakao Page provided by the subsidiaries. Users can use all Kakao platform services with a united account called Kakao Account.
RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.
Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.
YouTube is a video sharing service where users can create their own profile, upload videos, watch, like and comment on other videos.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
jQuery UI is a collection of GUI widgets, animated visual effects, and themes implemented with jQuery, Cascading Style Sheets, and HTML.
Beusable is a tool that visualises site visitors' behaviour, offering insights through graphical data representations.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Publisher Tag (GPT) is an ad tagging library for Google Ad Manager which is used to dynamically build ad requests.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Funding Choices) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
16 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/731bb364-aff0-4234-bb90-e951be96eefc)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/731bb364-aff0-4234-bb90-e951be96eefc"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdonga.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdonga.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 7h total → projected C (76)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+6Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 22.8 MB (7.4 MB transferred)
- · HSTS header is missing
- · 3 link(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+4Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found