Audit overview
4 categories need attention: Security, and 3 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
Cookie 'plala_WEB_spplalaweb' is missing the Secure flag
A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
Page weighs 7.2 MB (6.3 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
¥52,000 investment → ¥831,038/month returns + JPY 100,000,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.
- Page takes 17.7s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 15.2s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 262ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- Layout shifts during page loadContent movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields→ Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
¥100,000,000
- No privacy policy link detectedAPPI: JPY 100,000 – JPY 100,000,000
- 2 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedAPPI: JPY 100,000 – JPY 100,000,000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundAPPI: JPY 100,000 – JPY 100,000,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
¥830,802 /mo
+29.7pp bounce · ~2,967 lost visitors/mo
CPC: JPY 280.00
Bandwidth Waste
¥235 /mo
19705.5 MB/mo × 11.940 JPY/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~2.0 MB per page loadSaves ¥235/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
8.26 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
17.66 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
262 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.168
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
18.27 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
28.39 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.60 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
4.04 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
4 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.291
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
6.77 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
6.49 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 7.2 MB (6.3 MB transferred)
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
All checks pass
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 75+ on Security; you're at 55 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of jQuery sites score 74+ on Security; you're at 55 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Bootstrap 3.3.5, on Apache, hosted on Apache HTTP Server
Stack Architecture
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
Microsoft Advertising 
Microsoft Clarity 
Yahoo Advertising 
Bootstrap 3.3.5
Tailwind CSS 
jQuery 3.6.0
Apache Apache HTTP Server All Detected Technologies (10)
Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.
Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Microsoft Advertising is an online advertising platform developed by Microsoft.
Microsoft's Clarity is a analytics tool which provides website usage statistics, session recording, and heatmaps.
Yahoo Advertising includes a comprehensive suite of web, mobile, and video ad products across native, audience, and premium display, which are accessible through a new buying platform.
Observations (3)
No build tool detected
A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Bootstrap version may be outdated
Detected Bootstrap 3.3.5. The current major version is 5. Consider updating for security patches and new features.
Complex technology stack detected
10 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/73628208-1c4b-4716-bb54-fe85d8423523)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/73628208-1c4b-4716-bb54-fe85d8423523"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fplala.or.jp" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fplala.or.jpExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 6h total → projected C (78)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+8Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 7.2 MB (6.3 MB transferred)
- · Cookie 'plala_WEB_spplalaweb' is missing the Secure flag
- · HSTS header is missing
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+2Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found