Skip to content
https://vercel.com Export & share
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
26
TTFB stable →
92ms
FCP stable →
5.3s
LCP stable →
15.8s
Scanned
2026-08-27 13:20 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
4.2m
Vs prev
Improved by +7

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Excellent global latency — average 85ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (59ms), slowest from Amsterdam (119ms). Vercel edge cache (HIT).

United States - Santa Clara
Full audit
59ms
DNS 5ms · TLS 19ms
Singapore - Singapore
62ms
DNS 5ms · TLS 7ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
63ms
DNS 4ms · TLS 10ms
Spain - Madrid
87ms
DNS 2ms · TLS 37ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
119ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 21ms
United Stated - New York
118ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 20ms
CDN: Vercel (HIT) · Avg TTFB: 85ms · Cache: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

1

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

4

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
Warning: 4

124 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Warning: 5

3 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Your LCP of 8.2s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 8.2s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€1,573 investment → €13,643/month returns + EUR 120,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
€1.573
18.5 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€13.643
€163.720/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+10311% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.000.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€1.0630.1 mo payback · +15309% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€43 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.

Barriers
6
2 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+27pp
added vs baseline
Score
68
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
1
Nav
1
  • Page takes 8.2s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 5.7s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 91.6s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Viewport disables user zoom
    Visitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk
    → Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€1,573 18.5 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€43 1 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€8.842 / month at risk ~€106.105 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.000.000

ePrivacy DirectiveGDPR
  • 3 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    GDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • 3 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • 3 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    ePrivacy Directive: EUR 5.000 – EUR 100.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€8.842 /mo

+27.3pp bounce · ~2,728 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 3.24

Bandwidth Waste

€0,49 /mo

6663.9 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~666 KB per page load
    Saves €0,49/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Categories

8
Avg score 86.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Apple · 1299 peers
You 86
·
Avg 73
+13 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P99Security P98Content P96SEO P91Performance P87Sustainability P75Infrastructure P70Compliance P34

Top 10% of Apple sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 77 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 99% of Apple sites See full Apple benchmark →
Google Search Console · 4148 peers
You 86
·
Avg 74
+12 above average
0 50 100
Security P95Accessibility P95Content P93SEO P86Performance P76Sustainability P63Infrastructure P62Compliance P40

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 77 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 94% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Apple, hosted on Amazon Web Services, with Amazon S3 CDN

17 technologies detected 4 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Linkedin Insight Tag
Framework
Apple Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS Microsoft Open Graph Priority Hints React Tailwind CSS Webpack
CDN
Amazon S3 Vercel Edge
Hosting
Amazon Web Services Next.js 16.4.0-canary.4 Next.js App Router Vercel

All Detected Technologies (17)

Amazon S3 or Amazon Simple Storage Service is a service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that provides object storage through a web service interface.

Categories CDN Website https://aws.amazon.com/s3/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories CDN Website https://vercel.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-vercel-id: sfo1::iad1::kv6fn-1787836565993-d8ee6666d2f2

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive cloud services platform offering compute power, database storage, content delivery and other functionality.

Categories PaaS Website https://aws.amazon.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Next.js is a React framework for developing single page Javascript applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator Website https://nextjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://vercel.com/vc-ap-vercel-marketing/_next/static/immutable/chunks/0tdgvssvcka5h.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

The Next.js App Router is a new paradigm for building applications using React's latest features.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web servers Website https://nextjs.org/docs/app Detected by BeaverCheck

Vercel is a cloud platform for static frontends and serverless functions.

Categories PaaS Website https://vercel.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-vercel-id, Server: Vercel
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=80dYVZTf3bf7C8H5
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=J9NjkBE_oybWpa-OHAkV0VjSjIvIBMfp83tdsQCzxK8
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms81951275

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 134 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://webpack.js.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

LinkedIn Insight Tag is a lightweight JavaScript tag that powers conversion tracking, website audiences, and website demographics.

Categories Analytics Website https://business.linkedin.com/marketing-solutions/insight-tag Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Apple) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

17 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvercel.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/vercel.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/vercel.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvercel.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvercel.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 18h total → projected A (93)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

1 findings 0h → B (88)
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → A (90)
  • · 3 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
  • · 124 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+3

Higher effort, long-term payoff

2 findings 12h → A (93)
  • · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback