Skip to content
https://tvguide.com Export & share
Scanned
2026-04-22 21:20 UTC
Worker
🇧🇷 Sao Paulo
Duration
2.8m
Vs prev

Audit overview

Security and Accessibility need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

16 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 4

17 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

4 image-in-link without alt text

Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€723 investment → €9,240/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€723
8.5 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€9.240
€110.881/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+15247% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€6380.1 mo payback · +17293% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€85 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
7
2 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
65
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
3
  • Page takes 16.7s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 14.2s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 2.7s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
  • 8 link(s) with generic text ("click here", "read more")
    Screen-reader users navigating by link list see no context — and search engines can't infer relevance
    → Rewrite with descriptive phrases that identify the destination

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€723 8.5 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€85 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€9.240 / month at risk ~€110.881 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • No <main> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€9.239 /mo

+28.5pp bounce · ~2,851 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 3.24

Bandwidth Waste

€0,65 /mo

8752.8 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~875 KB per page load
    Saves €0,65/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

27
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
80
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

10.07 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

16.73 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

2.69 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

10.07 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

20.81 s

Desktop

53
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
78
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
73
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.73 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.26 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

549 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.010

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.81 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.60 s

Categories

8
Avg score 76.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cloudflare Bot Management · 474 peers
You 71
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Accessibility P3Compliance P95Sustainability P16Content P81Security P20Performance P21Infrastructure P24SEO P69

Top 10% of Cloudflare Bot Management sites score 72+ on Accessibility; you're at 47 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 11% of Cloudflare Bot Management sites See full Cloudflare Bot Management benchmark →
core-js · 1599 peers
You 71
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P95Accessibility P8Content P74Security P31Performance P39Sustainability P60SEO P49Infrastructure P49

Top 10% of core-js sites score 72+ on Accessibility; you're at 47 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 23% of core-js sites See full core-js benchmark →

Technology stack

Cloudflare Bot Management, on Python, hosted on Google Cloud, with Cloudflare...

23 technologies detected 5 stack layers 6 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Framework
Cloudflare Bot Management Express Facebook Google Domains Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS Lodash 4.17.21Microsoft Microsoft 365 Nuxt.js OneTrust Open Graph Reddit Sentry Vue.js Webpack core-js 3.37.1
Runtime
Python
CDN
Cloudflare Google Cloud CDN
Hosting
Google Cloud

All Detected Technologies (23)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Cloud CDN uses Google's global edge network to serve content closer to users.

Categories CDN Website https://cloud.google.com/cdn Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Cloud is a suite of cloud computing services.

Categories IaaS Website https://cloud.google.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Via header contains google
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Python is an interpreted and general-purpose programming language.

Categories Programming languages Website https://python.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Cloudflare bot management solution identifies and mitigates automated traffic to protect websites from bad bots.

Categories Security Website https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/products/bot-management/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence X-Powered-By: Express in redirect
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=pv9v3zyvnjaaeg5j8pl9t2wu5ol99g
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns-cloud-b4.googledomains.com
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=a_7LPLqs2LW00IwmVfs142XdgNajKLTueKgFDkXFZrM
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Lodash is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://www.lodash.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms69725510
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence TXT SPF record includes spf.protection.outlook.com: v=spf1 include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:_spf.google.com include:spf-00262c01.pphosted.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all

Nuxt is a Vue framework for developing modern web applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Static site generator Website https://nuxt.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

OneTrust is a cloud-based data privacy management compliance platform.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://www.onetrust.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains cdn.cookielaw.org: https://cdn.cookielaw.org/scripttemplates/otSDKStub.js

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Message boards Website https://code.reddit.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Sentry is an open-source platform for workflow productivity, aggregating errors from across the stack in real time.

Categories Issue trackers Website https://sentry.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://vuejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://webpack.js.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Cloudflare Bot Management) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

23 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftvguide.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/797e2fc6-75b2-488d-a2fb-b9b65803f77e)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/797e2fc6-75b2-488d-a2fb-b9b65803f77e"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftvguide.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftvguide.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (80)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → C (74)
  • · 17 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · 4 image-in-link without alt text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+6

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → B (80)
  • · 16 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback