https://policies.google.com Export & share

Scanned

2026-04-21 18:45 UTC

Worker

🇪🇸 Madrid

Duration

35.00s

Vs prev

—

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Impact

Quick Wins

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE

Desktop

Mobile

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure

34 third-party resources (90% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers

External link from www.gstatic.com lacks integrity attribute

External resource without SRI — if the third-party CDN is compromised, your site executes attacker-controlled code.

Security › Subresource Integrity

What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 3.3s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.

3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Your LCP is 3.3s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$192 investment → $7,431/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment

$192

1.9 h · 4 findings

Monthly returns

$7,431

$89,170/yr

Payback

0.0 mo

+46423% Y1

Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000

Or — fix only the top 3 findings

$142 → 0.0 mo payback · +62843% Y1

Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

$92 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~22%.

Barriers

9 warn

Bounce delta

+22pp

added vs baseline

Score

Speed

Trust

Usability

Content

Nav

Page loads in 3.3s
Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 767ms over
→ Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
High main-thread blocking time
Page is non-interactive for 335ms after first paint
→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
No HSTS header
Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
No Content-Security-Policy header
Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
No Open Graph tags
Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
→ Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$192 1.9 developer hours at $100/hr

Quick wins

$92 3 fixes in ~55 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

Custom rate

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$5,986 / month at risk ~$71,835 / year if left unfixed

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III

No <main> landmark found
ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
3 of 4 <nav> elements are unlabeled
ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$5,986 /mo

+22.3pp bounce · ~2,225 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.20 /mo

2495.8 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

Optimize transfer: save ~250 KB per page load
Saves $0.20/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Monthly visitors

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Conversion rate (%)

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Avg. order value

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue

Current bounce (est.)

After fixes (est.)

Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.38 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.27 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

335 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.51 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

7.63 s

Desktop

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

371 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

964 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

16 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

448 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.25 s

Categories

Content P3Infrastructure P86Compliance P83Sustainability P80Performance P79Accessibility P73SEO P39Security P60

Top 10% of Google Workspace sites score 96+ on Content; you're at 65 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 79% of Google Workspace sites See full Google Workspace benchmark →

HTTP/3 · 1676 peers

You 78

Avg 76

At average

0 50 100

Content P3Compliance P86Infrastructure P84Sustainability P66Performance P64Accessibility P63SEO P42Security P45

Top 10% of HTTP/3 sites score 96+ on Content; you're at 65 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 63% of HTTP/3 sites See full HTTP/3 benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Workspace

5 technologies detected 2 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Analytics

Google Analytics

Google Tag Manager

Framework

Google Workspace

HTTP/3

Priority Hints

All Detected Technologies (5)

Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: gmr-smtp-in.l.google.com

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-CVQP9NPQGY

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Workspace) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

Markdown

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpolicies.google.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/google.com)

HTML

<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/google.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpolicies.google.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>

Image URL

https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpolicies.google.com

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 2h total → projected B (84)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → B (84)

· No <main> landmark found
· HSTS header is missing
· 34 third-party resources (90% of weight)
· External link from www.gstatic.com lacks integrity attribute

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 1h → B (84)

· Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing