Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓Acceptable global latency — average 201ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (46ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (531ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 1 location above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
Compliance and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
Page weighs 11.2 MB (5.7 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
2 image(s) missing alt attribute
Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.
No H1 heading found
No H1 means screen-reader users can't identify the page's primary topic, and Google's content-extraction degrades.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
AUD 843 investment → AUD 8,518/month returns + AUD 50,200,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.
- Page takes 11.8s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 9.3s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 847msClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- Mixed content on HTTPS pageBrowsers block insecure subresources — broken images, missing scripts, warning badge→ Change http:// URLs inside the page to https:// (or protocol-relative)
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
AUD 50,200,000
- No privacy policy link detectedPrivacy Act 1988: AUD 66,000 – AUD 50,000,000
- 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent bannerPrivacy Act 1988: AUD 66,000 – AUD 50,000,000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundPrivacy Act 1988: AUD 66,000 – AUD 50,000,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
AUD 3,944 /mo
+30.3pp bounce · ~3,034 lost visitors/mo
CPC: AUD 1.30
Bandwidth Waste
AUD 2.21 /mo
17919.5 MB/mo × 0.123 AUD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.8 MB per page loadSaves AUD 2.21/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
8.32 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
11.77 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
847 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
8.32 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
13.33 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
862 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.02 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
56 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.014
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.50 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
2.61 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 11.2 MB (5.7 MB transferred)
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
2 image(s) missing alt attribute
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 59 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Squarespace 7.1, on TypeScript
Stack Architecture
All Detected Technologies (16)
TypeScript is an open-source language which builds on JavaScript by adding static type definitions.
Squarespace provides Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) for website building and hosting, and allows users to use pre-built website templates.
Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.
Squarespace Commerce is an ecommerce platform designed to facilitate the creation of websites and online stores, with domain registration and web hosting included.
Adobe Fonts is a web-based service providing access to a vast library of high-quality fonts for web and print design.
Angular is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework led by the Angular Team at Google.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
Modernizr is a JavaScript library that detects the features available in a user's browser.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
A modest JavaScript framework for the HTML you already have.
Typekit is an online service which offers a subscription library of fonts.
YUI is a JavaScript and CSS library with more than 30 unique components including low-level DOM utilities and high-level user-interface widgets.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
Statsig is a modern product experimentation platform that helps product teams continuously measure impact of every single feature they launch.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Adobe Fonts) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
16 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/7aad88de-c542-40fe-bc1b-d88b31c96a86)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/7aad88de-c542-40fe-bc1b-d88b31c96a86"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hoskingdesign.com.au" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hoskingdesign.com.auFix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (89)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+4Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 11.2 MB (5.7 MB transferred)
- · No H1 heading found
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+7Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 2 image(s) missing alt attribute
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found


