Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-16 17:03 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
54.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

5 categories need attention: Performance, and 4 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Cookie 'remixlang' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Critical: 5

No H1 heading found

No H1 means screen-reader users can't identify the page's primary topic, and Google's content-extraction degrades.

Accessibility › Heading Hierarchy
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₽23,042 investment → ₽233,878/month returns

Investment
₽23 042
6.6 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
₽233 878
₽2 806 531/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+12080% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₽21 8750.1 mo payback · +12730% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
₽2 042 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~39%.

Barriers
10
3 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+39pp
added vs baseline
Score
49
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
2
  • Page takes 24.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 21.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.6s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₽23,042 6.6 developer hours at ₽3500/hr
Quick wins
₽2,042 3 fixes in ~35 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₽233 878 / month at risk ~₽2 806 531 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

₽233 801 /mo

+39.0pp bounce · ~3,897 lost visitors/mo

CPC: RUB 60.00

Bandwidth Waste

₽77 /mo

10590.5 MB/mo × 7.273 RUB/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.1 MB per page load
    Saves ₽77/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

30
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
87
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

7.63 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

24.32 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.63 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

9.21 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

24.81 s

Desktop

60
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
73
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
91
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.32 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.88 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

134 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.003

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.32 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.79 s

Categories

8
Avg score 69.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

core-js · 1582 peers
You 68
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
SEO P2Content P7Sustainability P17Compliance P19Security P20Performance P33Infrastructure P41Accessibility P57

Top 10% of core-js sites score 95+ on SEO; you're at 76 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 4% of core-js sites See full core-js benchmark →
Google Search Console · 3817 peers
You 68
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Content P5Sustainability P12Security P14SEO P18Performance P24Compliance P27Infrastructure P36Accessibility P59

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 96+ on Content; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 3% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console, on KPHP

10 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS MobX PWA Sentry VKUI core-js 3.49.0
Runtime
KPHP 7.4.126419 PHP 7.4.126419

All Detected Technologies (10)

KPHP (kPHP or KittenPHP) is a free PHP-to- C++ source-to-source translator, developed by VKontakte.

Categories Programming languages Website https://vkcom.github.io/kphp Detected by BeaverCheck

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-powered-by: KPHP/7.4.126419
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=bQE4SQUYC7KTvk4XCaMdwF0e_tj-O-6ZXMfXW2a8mHY
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence TXT SPF record includes _spf.google.com: v=spf1 ip4:93.186.224.0/20 ip4:87.240.128.0/18 ip4:95.142.192.0/21 mx include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.mail.ru ~all

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://mobx.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) are web apps built and enhanced with modern APIs to deliver enhanced capabilities, reliability, and installability while reaching anyone, anywhere, on any device, all with a single codebase.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://web.dev/progressive-web-apps/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Sentry is an open-source platform for workflow productivity, aggregating errors from across the stack in real time.

Categories Issue trackers Website https://sentry.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

VKUI is a set of React components with which you can create interfaces that are visually indistinguishable from our iOS and Android applications.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://vkcom.github.io/VKUI Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (5)

Runtime exposed via X-Powered-By header

The X-Powered-By header reveals 'KPHP 7.4.126419'. Remove this header in production to reduce information leakage.

→ Security

Runtime exposed via X-Powered-By header

The X-Powered-By header reveals 'PHP 7.4.126419'. Remove this header in production to reduce information leakage.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

PHP version may be outdated

Detected PHP 7.4.126419. The current major version is 8. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

10 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvk.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/7ade6d3a-7c64-4248-9419-913ae1217ad0)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/7ade6d3a-7c64-4248-9419-913ae1217ad0"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvk.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvk.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected C (77)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (74)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · No H1 heading found
  • · Cookie 'remixlang' is missing the Secure flag

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → C (77)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback