Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-28 11:00 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
40.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 410ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (48ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (979ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 2 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
282ms
DNS 35ms · TLS 124ms
United States - Santa Clara
87ms
DNS 13ms · TLS 38ms
United Stated - New York
48ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 20ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
979ms
DNS 224ms · TLS 379ms
Singapore - Singapore
937ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 465ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
125ms
DNS 19ms · TLS 55ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 410ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 5

10 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

AED 1,938 investment → AED 37,179/month returns + AED 5,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
AED 1,938
7.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
AED 37,179
AED 446,147/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+22927% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided AED 5,000,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
AED 1,5630.0 mo payback · +28453% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
AED 188 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.

Barriers
8
1 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+27pp
added vs baseline
Score
69
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 7.1s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 4.6s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 246ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 1 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

د.إ1,938 7.8 developer hours at د.إ250/hr
Quick wins
د.إ188 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

د.إ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

AED 21,211 / month at risk ~AED 254,538 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

AED 5,000,000

UAE PDPL
  • No privacy policy link detected
    UAE PDPL: AED 10,000 – AED 5,000,000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    UAE PDPL: AED 10,000 – AED 5,000,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

AED 21,210 /mo

+26.5pp bounce · ~2,651 lost visitors/mo

CPC: AED 8.00

Bandwidth Waste

AED 1.48 /mo

4996.8 MB/mo × 0.296 AED/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~500 KB per page load
    Saves AED 1.48/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

61
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
83
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.64 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

7.13 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

246 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.83 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

7.42 s

Desktop

84
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
83
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.41 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.02 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.64 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.07 s

Categories

8
Avg score 74.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

CMS · 1744 peers
You 71
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Better than 14% of CMS sites
Hammer.js · 93 peers
You 71
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Better than 24% of Hammer.js sites See full Hammer.js benchmark →

Technology stack

Tilda, hosted on GoDaddy

7 technologies detected 3 stack layers Complex

Stack Architecture

CMS
Tilda
Framework
Hammer.js 2.0.8Masonry Open Graph Priority Hints imagesLoaded
Hosting
GoDaddy

All Detected Technologies (7)

Categories Hosting Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence NS record: ns27.domaincontrol.com

Tilda is a web design tool.

Categories CMS Website https://tilda.cc Detected by BeaverCheck

Hammer.js is a JavaScript library for adding touch gestures like swipe, pinch, and rotate to web applications.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://hammerjs.github.io Detected by BeaverCheck

Masonry is a JavaScript library that enables a cascading grid layout, positioning elements based on available vertical space for an optimized, gap-free arrangement.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://masonry.desandro.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery plugin for seeing if the images are loaded.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://imagesloaded.desandro.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Hammer.js) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ficetrayweedclub.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/7ae0350e-d7d6-42a9-a615-52ad0883f1b7)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/7ae0350e-d7d6-42a9-a615-52ad0883f1b7"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ficetrayweedclub.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ficetrayweedclub.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (80)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → C (75)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 10 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → B (80)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback