Skip to content
IN · INR (₹) · Estimated Applicable regulations: DPDP Act Dev cost: ₹1,500/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-11-05 10:01 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.3m
Vs prev
—

Audit overview

Content needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

easybankloans.co.in fails 1 mail check: No DMARC record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Connection is not encrypted (plain HTTP)

Plain-HTTP sites leak everything — credentials, session cookies, browsing history — to anyone on the network path.

Security › TLS & Certificates
Critical: 2

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 4

Page weighs 4.7 MB (4.1 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

1 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 6.0s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 6.0s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₹7,125 investment → ₹170,948/month returns

Investment
₹7,125
4.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
₹1,70,948
₹20,51,372/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+28691% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₹6,375 → 0.0 mo payback · +32078% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
₹2,625 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~40%.

Barriers
9
4 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+40pp
added vs baseline
Score
45
D
Speed
2
Trust
3
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
2
  • Page takes 6.0s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.5s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 3.9s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • Site is not served over HTTPS
    Browsers show "Not Secure" in the URL bar — visitors abandon before reading
    → Install a TLS certificate (Let's Encrypt is free) and redirect HTTP → HTTPS
  • 22 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₹7,125 4.8 developer hours at ₹1500/hr
Quick wins
₹2,625 3 fixes in ~105 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

₹ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₹1,20,795 / month at risk ~₹14,49,542 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

₹1,20,708 /mo

+40.2pp bounce · ~4,024 lost visitors/mo

CPC: INR 30.00

Bandwidth Waste

₹87 /mo

13015.0 MB/mo × 6.667 INR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.3 MB per page load
    Saves ₹87/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

39
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
86
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.12 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.97 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

3.91 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.004

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.31 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

13.90 s

Desktop

70
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.00 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.06 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

80 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.006

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.42 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.41 s

Categories

8
Avg score 78.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Framer Motion · 142 peers
You 81
·
Avg 77
At average
0 50 100
Better than 67% of Framer Motion sites See full Framer Motion benchmark →
Lucide · 377 peers
You 81
·
Avg 84
At average
0 50 100
Better than 19% of Lucide sites See full Lucide benchmark →

Technology stack

Framer Motion, on LiteSpeed

6 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Framer Motion Lucide React React Router 7.14.1 Tailwind CSS
Server
LiteSpeed

All Detected Technologies (6)

LiteSpeed is a high-scalability web server.

Categories Web servers Website https://litespeedtech.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: LiteSpeed
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Framer Motion is a modern animation library for JavaScript, React, and Vue.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://motion.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides 1000+ vector (svg) files for displaying icons and symbols in digital and non-digital projects.

Categories Font scripts Website https://lucide.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

React Router provides declarative routing for React.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactrouter.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 253 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Framer Motion) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=http%3A%2F%2Feasybankloans.co.in)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/easybankloans.co.in)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/easybankloans.co.in"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=http%3A%2F%2Feasybankloans.co.in" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=http%3A%2F%2Feasybankloans.co.in

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 5h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+8

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 2h → B (89)
  • · Page weighs 4.7 MB (4.1 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 1 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · Connection is not encrypted (plain HTTP)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 3h → B (89)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback