Skip to content
FR · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: RGPD · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €80/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-10-12 08:38 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
43.00s
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Acceptable global latency — average 282ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (145ms), slowest from Singapore (651ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC). 1 location above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
185ms
DNS 37ms · TLS 24ms
United Stated - New York
145ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 15ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
158ms
DNS 16ms · TLS 20ms
United States - Santa Clara
182ms
DNS 36ms · TLS 20ms
Singapore - Singapore
651ms
DNS 48ms · TLS 84ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
370ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 13ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 282ms · Cache: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

exonore.fr fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Unrendered Mustache/Handlebars/Vue template syntax visible in page body

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Empty Page Detection
Critical: 2

3 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 3

3 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 4

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
Warning: 5

2 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)

Source maps reveal original source code (variable names, comments, file structure) and are shipped to production by mistake almost universally. The standard fix is a one-line build-tool config change.

Security › Source Map Exposure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€240 investment → €7,081/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€240
3.0 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€7.081
€84.976/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+35307% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€160 → 0.0 mo payback · +53010% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€160 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~24%.

Barriers
7
1 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+24pp
added vs baseline
Score
72
B
Speed
2
Trust
0
Usability
1
Content
2
Nav
2
  • 3 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • Page loads in 3.7s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 1.2s over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 228ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€240 3.0 developer hours at €80/hr
Quick wins
€160 4 fixes in ~120 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

€ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€5.290 / month at risk ~€63.479 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • Multiple <main> landmarks (3 found)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • 1 of 2 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€5.289 /mo

+24.0pp bounce · ~2,404 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,58 /mo

7801.1 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~780 KB per page load
    Saves €0,58/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

86
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
54
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.26 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.66 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

228 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.008

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.21 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

7.18 s

Desktop

99
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
54
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

355 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

824 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

5 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.012

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

401 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.57 s

Categories

8
Avg score 80.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 1096 peers
You 82
·
Avg 75
+7 above average
0 50 100
Security P94Compliance P8Accessibility P82Content P24Performance P72Sustainability P69SEO P41Infrastructure P58

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 68 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 87% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
Chart.js · 38 peers
You 82
·
Avg 76
+6 above average
0 50 100
Better than 76% of Chart.js sites See full Chart.js benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap, with Cloudflare CDN

11 technologies detected 3 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Stripe
Framework
Bootstrap Chart.js Cloudflare Turnstile HSTS HTTP/3 PWA Tailwind CSS
CDN
Cloudflare cdnjs jsDelivr CDN

All Detected Technologies (11)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Script URL contains cdnjs.cloudflare.com: https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jspdf/2.5.1/jspdf.umd.min.js
Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Script URL contains cdn.jsdelivr.net: https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/chart.js@4.4.0/dist/chart.umd.min.js
Categories Framework Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Found 4 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML

Chart.js is an open-source JavaScript library that allows you to draw different types of charts by using the HTML5 canvas element.

Categories JavaScript graphics Website https://www.chartjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Turnstile is Cloudflare's smart CAPTCHA alternative.

Categories Security Website https://www.cloudflare.com/products/turnstile Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains challenges.cloudflare.com: https://challenges.cloudflare.com/turnstile/v0/api.js?render=explicit&onload=onTurnstileApiLoad

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) are web apps built and enhanced with modern APIs to deliver enhanced capabilities, reliability, and installability while reaching anyone, anywhere, on any device, all with a single codebase.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://web.dev/progressive-web-apps/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 15 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Stripe offers online payment processing for internet businesses as well as fraud prevention, invoicing and subscription management.

Categories Payment processors Website https://stripe.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapp.exonore.fr)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/exonore.fr)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/exonore.fr"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapp.exonore.fr" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapp.exonore.fr

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 3h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 2h → B (89)
  • · Unrendered Mustache/Handlebars/Vue template syntax visible in page body
  • · 3 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
  • · 2 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 1h → B (89)
  • · 3 control(s) without accessible label

Send Feedback