Skip to content
Scanned
2026-09-24 15:48 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
2.0m
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

High global latency — average 622ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (27ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1134ms). Assets on Akamai (host www.iveco.com, 8 assets); document served directly from origin (Microsoft Azure). Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
188ms
DNS 50ms · TLS 58ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
27ms
DNS 4ms · TLS 13ms
United Stated - New York
500ms
DNS 105ms · TLS 161ms
Singapore - Singapore
988ms
DNS 144ms · TLS 341ms
United States - Santa Clara
897ms
DNS 166ms · TLS 294ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1134ms
DNS 215ms · TLS 371ms
CDN: Akamai (assets only) · Avg TTFB: 622ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

2 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 3

6 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 4

No H1 heading found

No H1 means screen-reader users can't identify the page's primary topic, and Google's content-extraction degrades.

Accessibility › Heading Hierarchy
Critical: 5

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
4 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€312 investment → €3,206/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€312
5.7 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€3.206
€38.469/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+12243% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€275 → 0.1 mo payback · +13889% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€64 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~15%.

Barriers
6
6 warn
Bounce delta
+15pp
added vs baseline
Score
82
B
Speed
0
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
2
  • HSTS header is present but disabled
    The header is served with no enforcing max-age, so browsers ignore it and first requests stay downgradeable
    → Set a real lifetime: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€312 5.7 developer hours at €55/hr
Quick wins
€64 3 fixes in ~70 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

€ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€3.206 / month at risk ~€38.469 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveGDPREAA
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    ePrivacy Directive: EUR 5.000 – EUR 100.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€3.205 /mo

+14.6pp bounce · ~1,457 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,54 /mo

7264.2 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~726 KB per page load
    Saves €0,54/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

0
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
85
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.36 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

0 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

9.77 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

0 ms

Desktop

63
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
85
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.24 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

7.68 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

25 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.10 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

7.73 s

Categories

8
Avg score 78.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Boomerang · 159 peers
You 79
·
Avg 72
+7 above average
0 50 100
Better than 96% of Boomerang sites See full Boomerang benchmark →
core-js · 1779 peers
You 79
·
Avg 73
+6 above average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P5Security P92Compliance P13Performance P87Accessibility P80Content P22Sustainability P70SEO P47

Top 10% of core-js sites score 94+ on Infrastructure; you're at 78 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 84% of core-js sites See full core-js benchmark →

Technology stack

Boomerang

18 technologies detected 3 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Akamai mPulse Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Build
Webpack
Framework
Boomerang Facebook Google Font API Google Search Console HSTS LottieFiles Microsoft Microsoft ASP.NET n/a OneTrust Open Graph Proofpoint Qualtrics React core-js 3.35.1

All Detected Technologies (18)

boomerang is a JavaScript library that measures the page load time experienced by real users, commonly called RUM (Real User Measurement).

Categories JavaScript libraries, RUM Website https://akamai.github.io/boomerang Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=3h2j8kxfxsdcexxdpacmbwwsthjabs

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=4_WzKJ4zS1XlDWW-l05Xcwl3aZ1CLZfKDVjf1ZJ91G0

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

LottieFiles is an open-source animation file format that's tiny, high quality, interactive, and can be manipulated at runtime.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://lottiefiles.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms25457343

ASP.NET is an open-source, server-side web-application framework designed for web development to produce dynamic web pages.

Categories Web frameworks Website https://www.asp.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

OneTrust is a cloud-based data privacy management compliance platform.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://www.onetrust.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains cdn.cookielaw.org: https://cdn.cookielaw.org/consent/0195fbd2-cf94-79e7-8a51-a00cd8d68949/OtAutoBlock.js

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: mxb-004a4f03.gslb.pphosted.com

Qualtrics is an cloud-based platform for creating and distributing web-based surveys.

Categories Surveys Website https://www.qualtrics.com Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

Akamai mPulse is a real user monitoring (RUM) solution that enables companies to monitor, find, and fix website and application performance issues.

Categories RUM Website https://developer.akamai.com/akamai-mpulse-real-user-monitoring-solution Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-V56NZFY1F3&cx=c&gtm=4e69m1
Categories Build Tool Website https://webpack.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Chunk pattern: https://iveco.com/dist/ivgcorporate/static/js/main.e751f011.js

Observations (1)

Complex technology stack detected

18 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fiveco.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/iveco.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/iveco.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fiveco.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fiveco.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected B (86)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (83)
  • · No H1 heading found
  • · 2 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 4h → B (86)
  • · 6 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback