Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓Excellent global latency — average 45ms across 6 locations, fastest from Sao Paulo (25ms), slowest from Madrid (93ms). Cloudflare in front. Cache-Control header is missing.
Audit overview
All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
1 control(s) without accessible label
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
2 image(s) missing alt attribute
Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.
No H1 heading found
No H1 means screen-reader users can't identify the page's primary topic, and Google's content-extraction degrades.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€758 investment → €13,401/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.
- Page takes 10.5s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 8.0s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- 31 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 344ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€500.000
- 1 of 2 <nav> elements are unlabeledEAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
- Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
- No H1 heading foundEAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€9.392 /mo
+29.0pp bounce · ~2,898 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 3.24
Bandwidth Waste
€0,60 /mo
8142.4 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~814 KB per page loadSaves €0,60/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
4.21 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
10.54 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
344 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
6.25 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
11.70 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.18 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.22 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.005
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.47 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
2.39 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Accessibility
1 control(s) without accessible label
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Apple sites score 95+ on SEO; you're at 86 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Apple, with Cloudflare CDN
Stack Architecture
Google Tag Manager 
Backbone.js 1.4.0
Cloudflare Bot Management 
GSAP Google Search Console 
Lodash 4.18.1Microsoft 
Open Graph Proofpoint 
ScrollMagic 2.0.7
Select2 
jQuery 3.7.0
jQuery UI 1.13.2
toastr 2.1.3 Cloudflare All Detected Technologies (16)
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
BackboneJS is a JavaScript library that allows to develop and structure the client side applications that run in a web browser.
Cloudflare bot management solution identifies and mitigates automated traffic to protect websites from bad bots.
GSAP is an animation library that allows you to create animations with JavaScript.
Lodash is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
ScrollMagic is a jQuery plugin which essentially lets you use the scrollbar like a playback scrub control.
Select2 is a jQuery based replacement for select boxes. It supports searching, remote data sets, and infinite scrolling of results.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
jQuery UI is a collection of GUI widgets, animated visual effects, and themes implemented with jQuery, Cascading Style Sheets, and HTML.
toastr is a Javascript library for non-blocking notifications. The goal is to create a simple core library that can be customized and extended.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Apple) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
16 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/rtx.com)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/rtx.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Frtx.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Frtx.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
3 sprints · 9h total → projected B (89)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+4Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · No H1 heading found
- · HSTS header is missing
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+2Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 1 control(s) without accessible label
- · 2 image(s) missing alt attribute
Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements
Higher effort, long-term payoff
- · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source