Skip to content
Scanned
2026-05-10 12:46 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
57.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 866ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (429ms), slowest from Singapore (1496ms). No CDN detected. 5 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
876ms
DNS 36ms · TLS 464ms
United States - Santa Clara
583ms
DNS 60ms · TLS 281ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
983ms
DNS 51ms · TLS 513ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
827ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 457ms
Singapore - Singapore
1496ms
DNS 201ms · TLS 744ms
United Stated - New York
429ms
DNS 43ms · TLS 195ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 866ms · Cache: private

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Cookie 'ASPSESSIONIDAATACABB' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

Cookie 'CWSessionTimeout' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 4

Cookie 'SessionID' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 5

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
5 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$400 investment → $9,504/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$400
4.0 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$9,504
$114,050/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+28413% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$3500.0 mo payback · +32486% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$100 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.

Barriers
9
1 crit 8 warn
Bounce delta
+27pp
added vs baseline
Score
66
C
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
2
  • 4 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • Page loads in 3.8s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 1.3s over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$400 4.0 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$100 4 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

$20,257 / month at risk ~$243,087 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • 5 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No H1 heading found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • 1 heading(s) are over 120 characters -- likely a misformatted paragraph
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • 1 image(s) missing alt attribute
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • 4 control(s) without accessible label
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$7,132 /mo

+26.5pp bounce · ~2,651 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.42 /mo

5196.2 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~520 KB per page load
    Saves $0.42/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

83
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
74
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
73
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.75 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.76 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.073

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.59 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.76 s

Desktop

97
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
75
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
73
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

676 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

887 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.042

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.54 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

887 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 75.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Framework · 1621 peers
You 77
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Better than 73% of Framework sites
Bootstrap · 855 peers
You 77
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P96SEO P8Content P10Infrastructure P14Accessibility P83Performance P82Sustainability P67

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 55 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 79% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →

Technology stack

Backstretch, on IIS/ASP.NET, hosted on Microsoft IIS

11 technologies detected 4 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Framework
Backstretch Bootstrap 3.2.0 Font Awesome Microsoft ASP.NET Modernizr 2.6.2Tablesorter Windows Server jQuery 1.10.2
Runtime
ASP.NET
Server
IIS 10.0
Hosting
Microsoft IIS 10.0

All Detected Technologies (11)

Internet Information Services (IIS) is an extensible web server software created by Microsoft for use with the Windows NT family.

Categories Web servers Website https://www.iis.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Server Website https://www.iis.net Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Microsoft-IIS/10.0
Categories Runtime Website https://dotnet.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-powered-by: ASP.NET

A simple jQuery plugin that allows you to add a dynamically-resized, slideshow-capable background image to any page or element.

Categories JavaScript graphics, JavaScript libraries Website https://www.jquery-backstretch.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 7 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fontawesome.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

ASP.NET is an open-source, server-side web-application framework designed for web development to produce dynamic web pages.

Categories Web frameworks Website https://www.asp.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Modernizr is a JavaScript library that detects the features available in a user's browser.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://modernizr.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Flexible client-side table sorting.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://mottie.github.io/tablesorter/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Windows Server is a brand name for a group of server operating systems.

Categories Operating systems Website https://microsoft.com/windowsserver Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://www.compliancewire.com/CW3/Assets/js/jquery-1.10.2.js;wa61b045176d16f9a0
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (5)

Server version exposed in headers

The Server header reveals 'IIS 10.0'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Backstretch) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Bootstrap version may be outdated

Detected Bootstrap 3.2.0. The current major version is 5. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

jQuery version may be outdated

Detected jQuery 1.10.2. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.compliancewire.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/7ef00ce9-2f6e-4a66-b9b3-0e9af1c0abad)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/7ef00ce9-2f6e-4a66-b9b3-0e9af1c0abad"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.compliancewire.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.compliancewire.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 4h total → projected B (82)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → B (82)
  • · Cookie 'ASPSESSIONIDAATACABB' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie 'CWSessionTimeout' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie 'SessionID' is missing the Secure flag
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 3h → B (82)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback