Skip to content
Scanned
2026-08-21 05:36 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 220ms across 6 locations, fastest from Singapore (109ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (493ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC).

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
303ms
DNS 38ms · TLS 21ms
United Stated - New York
163ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 12ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
141ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 10ms
United States - Santa Clara
113ms
DNS 23ms · TLS 11ms
Singapore - Singapore
109ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 10ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
493ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 134ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 220ms · Cache: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

supportkori.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page weighs 9.9 MB (7.9 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 4

Scan returned a Cloudflare bot-protection interstitial, not the actual page

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Bot Challenge Detection
Critical: 5

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 24.7s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 24.7s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$700 investment → $8,336/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$700
7.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$8,336
$100,035/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+14191% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6500.1 mo payback · +15290% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$100 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.

Barriers
9
2 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+31pp
added vs baseline
Score
59
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
4
Nav
1
  • Page takes 24.7s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 22.2s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 672ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$700 7.0 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$100 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$8,336 / month at risk ~$100,035 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$8,334 /mo

+31.0pp bounce · ~3,098 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$1.98 /mo

24751.0 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~2.5 MB per page load
    Saves $1.98/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

50
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
84
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.35 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

24.72 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

672 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

7.80 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

26.99 s

Desktop

78
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
84
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

363 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.81 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

3 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.002

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.60 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.08 s

Categories

8
Avg score 78.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

AngularJS · 468 peers
You 80
·
Avg 74
+6 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P96Compliance P7SEO P90Infrastructure P14Content P84Sustainability P23Security P62Performance P58

Top 10% of AngularJS sites score 82+ on Compliance; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 82% of AngularJS sites See full AngularJS benchmark →
Cloudflare Turnstile · 489 peers
You 80
·
Avg 74
+6 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P96Compliance P7Infrastructure P13SEO P85Content P82Sustainability P23Security P60Performance P59

Top 10% of Cloudflare Turnstile sites score 82+ on Compliance; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 82% of Cloudflare Turnstile sites See full Cloudflare Turnstile benchmark →

Technology stack

AngularJS, hosted on Vercel, with Cloudflare CDN

6 technologies detected 3 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
AngularJS Cloudflare Turnstile HSTS HTTP/3
CDN
Cloudflare
Hosting
Vercel

All Detected Technologies (6)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Vercel is a cloud platform for static frontends and serverless functions.

Categories PaaS Website https://vercel.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-vercel-id

AngularJS is a JavaScript-based open-source web application framework led by the Angular Team at Google.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://angularjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Turnstile is Cloudflare's smart CAPTCHA alternative.

Categories Security Website https://www.cloudflare.com/products/turnstile Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains challenges.cloudflare.com: https://challenges.cloudflare.com/turnstile/v0/g/aae2b9a1c261/api.js?onload=mlyM5&render=explicit

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (AngularJS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.supportkori.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/supportkori.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/supportkori.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.supportkori.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.supportkori.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (86)
  • · Page weighs 9.9 MB (7.9 MB transferred)
  • · Scan returned a Cloudflare bot-protection interstitial, not the actual page
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → A (90)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback