Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-21 21:01 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
59.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page weighs 28.1 MB (11.3 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Warning: 4

84 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 17.7s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 17.7s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

CAD 665 investment → CAD 8,679/month returns + CAD 250,000 risk avoided

Investment
CAD 665
7.0 h · 3 findings
Monthly returns
CAD 8,679
CAD 104,147/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+15561% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided CAD 250,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
CAD 6650.1 mo payback · +15561% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.

Barriers
7
3 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+31pp
added vs baseline
Score
58
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
1
  • Page takes 17.7s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 15.2s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1000ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 3 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

CA$665 7.0 developer hours at CA$95/hr

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

CA$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

CAD 8,679 / month at risk ~CAD 104,147 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

CAD 250,000

ACA
  • 6 image(s) with generic alt text
    ACA: CAD 250 – CAD 250,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

CAD 8,675 /mo

+31.0pp bounce · ~3,098 lost visitors/mo

CPC: CAD 2.80

Bandwidth Waste

CAD 3.84 /mo

35497.6 MB/mo × 0.108 CAD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~3.5 MB per page load
    Saves CAD 3.84/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

39
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.86 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

17.67 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1000 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.78 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

17.76 s

Desktop

54
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.31 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.86 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

33 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.495

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.58 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.66 s

Categories

8
Avg score 73.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Storyblok · 8 peers
You 71
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Amazon Route 53 · 1003 peers
You 71
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P96Infrastructure P5Sustainability P5SEO P13Content P80Security P24Accessibility P66Performance P38

Top 10% of Amazon Route 53 sites score 93+ on Infrastructure; you're at 80 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 23% of Amazon Route 53 sites See full Amazon Route 53 benchmark →

Technology stack

Storyblok, on Apache, hosted on Apache HTTP Server

21 technologies detected 5 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Tag Manager
CMS
Storyblok
Framework
Amazon Route 53 Apple Framer Motion Google Search Console HSTS Lucide Microsoft Open Graph Priority Hints Radix UI React Tailwind CSS Webpack dc.js shadcn/ui
Server
Apache
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server Next.js 15.5.12 Next.js App Router

All Detected Technologies (21)

Categories Server Website https://httpd.apache.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Apache

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Next.js is a React framework for developing single page Javascript applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator Website https://nextjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://blackberry.com/_next/static/chunks/4bd1b696-182b6b13bdad92e3.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

The Next.js App Router is a new paradigm for building applications using React's latest features.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web servers Website https://nextjs.org/docs/app Detected by BeaverCheck

Storyblok is a headless CMS with a visual editor for developers, marketers and content editors. Storyblok helps your team to manage content and digital experiences for every use-case from corporate websites, ecommerce, helpdesks, mobile apps, screen displays, and more.

Categories CMS Website https://www.storyblok.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns-249.awsdns-31.com
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=hqoRZmwVQRh39BQU

Framer Motion is a modern animation library for JavaScript, React, and Vue.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://motion.dev Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=EKG9-e6zepP7I9mgEi2azGZP20vM9qsuPglapFJUA10

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides 1000+ vector (svg) files for displaying icons and symbols in digital and non-digital projects.

Categories Font scripts Website https://lucide.dev Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=38EA9BD27EB12F19F52629043F02AA152E9CB128

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Radix UI is a React-based user interface component library that offers accessible, responsive, and customisable components for building web applications.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://www.radix-ui.com Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Tailwind is a utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://tailwindcss.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 160 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://webpack.js.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

A multi-dimensional charting library built to work natively with crossfilter and rendered using d3.js

Categories JavaScript graphics, JavaScript libraries Website https://dc-js.github.io/dc.js/ Detected by BeaverCheck

shadcn/ui is a component system built with Radix UI and Tailwind CSS.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://ui.shadcn.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-KXKJ3PRQ

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Amazon Route 53) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

21 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fblackberry.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/7fd17c2d-bc67-46b2-8e89-545f3f9efe79)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/7fd17c2d-bc67-46b2-8e89-545f3f9efe79"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fblackberry.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fblackberry.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected C (79)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → C (75)
  • · Page weighs 28.1 MB (11.3 MB transferred)
  • · 84 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → C (79)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback