Skip to content
https://github.blog Export & share
Scanned
2026-04-21 21:13 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.2m
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

1 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 4

2 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

No H1 heading found

No H1 means screen-reader users can't identify the page's primary topic, and Google's content-extraction degrades.

Accessibility › Heading Hierarchy
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$717 investment → $1,930/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$717
7.2 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$1,930
$23,155/yr
Payback
0.4 mo
+3131% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6500.3 mo payback · +3462% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$117 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

4 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~23%.

Barriers
4
2 crit 2 warn
Bounce delta
+23pp
added vs baseline
Score
74
B
Speed
1
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
2
  • Page takes 14.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 12.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 5 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 9 link(s) with generic text ("click here", "read more")
    Screen-reader users navigating by link list see no context — and search engines can't infer relevance
    → Rewrite with descriptive phrases that identify the destination

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$717 7.2 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$117 3 fixes in ~70 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$1,526 / month at risk ~$18,308 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • No H1 heading found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$1,525 /mo

+23.5pp bounce · ~2,346 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 0.65

Bandwidth Waste

$0.84 /mo

10495.8 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.0 MB per page load
    Saves $0.84/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

74
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
89
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.51 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

14.52 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

86 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.51 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

14.59 s

Desktop

86
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
89
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

340 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.59 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

8 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

362 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.61 s

Categories

8
Avg score 80.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

WordPress · 775 peers
You 78
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P95Performance P79SEO P75Security P26Accessibility P74Sustainability P30Content P40Infrastructure P56

Top 10% of WordPress sites score 77+ on Security; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 76% of WordPress sites See full WordPress benchmark →
Bootstrap · 885 peers
You 78
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P95Accessibility P77Performance P75SEO P73Infrastructure P71Security P31Content P68Sustainability P34

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 75+ on Security; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 83% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →

Technology stack

WordPress 6.9.4, on PHP, hosted on Azure, with Nginx CDN

20 technologies detected 6 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Azure Monitor Yoast SEO
CMS
WordPress 6.9.4
Framework
Bootstrap Bulma Google Search Console HSTS MySQL NS1 Open Graph Priority Hints RSS Tailwind CSS Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) YouTube core-js 3.40.0
Runtime
PHP
CDN
Nginx
Hosting
Azure WordPress VIP

All Detected Technologies (20)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Azure is a cloud computing service for building, testing, deploying, and managing applications and services through Microsoft-managed data centers.

Categories PaaS Website https://azure.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck

WordPress VIP is a managed hosting platform for WordPress.

Categories PaaS Website https://wpvip.com Detected by BeaverCheck

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.

Categories CMS, Blogs Website https://wordpress.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Link URL: https://github.blog/wp-content/themes/github-2021/dist/fonts/mona-sans.woff2, Header link contains wp-json
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Framework Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Found 3 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML
Categories Framework Website https://bulma.io Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 17 Bulma class patterns in HTML
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=HPL8binrED5R9U3oyWqWsnVr1e2EI9hnKlLizQywIlQ

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

MySQL is an open-source relational database management system.

Categories Databases Website https://mysql.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: dns1.p05.nsone.net

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 84 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Twitter Emoji is a set of open-source emoticons and emojis for Twitter, TweetDeck, and also for Android and iOS versions of the application.

Categories Font scripts Website https://twitter.github.io/twemoji/ Detected by BeaverCheck

YouTube is a video sharing service where users can create their own profile, upload videos, watch, like and comment on other videos.

Categories Video players Website https://www.youtube.com Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

Azure Monitor collects monitoring telemetry from a variety of on-premises and Azure sources. Azure Monitor helps you maximise the availability and performance of your applications and services.

Categories Analytics, Performance Website https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/monitor Detected by BeaverCheck

Yoast SEO is a search engine optimisation plugin for WordPress and other platforms.

Categories SEO, WordPress plugins Website https://yoast.com/wordpress/plugins/seo/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

WordPress detected — review security configuration

WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

20 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.blog)](https://beavercheck.com/results/8010db96-c634-4f5c-b7bd-eb0a4d2bf79f)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/8010db96-c634-4f5c-b7bd-eb0a4d2bf79f"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.blog" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.blog

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (86)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (81)
  • · No H1 heading found
  • · 1 link(s) with no accessible text
  • · 2 button(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (86)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback