Skip to content
RU · RUB (₽) · Estimated Dev cost: ₽3,500/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-21 21:05 UTC
Worker
🇸🇬 Singapore
Duration
1.6m
Vs prev

Audit overview

Security and Accessibility need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

1 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

3 image-in-link without alt text

Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₽25,375 investment → ₽256,066/month returns

Investment
₽25 375
7.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
₽256 066
₽3 072 792/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+12010% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₽21 8750.1 mo payback · +13947% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
₽4 375 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.

Barriers
7
3 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+30pp
added vs baseline
Score
58
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
0
Nav
2
  • Page takes 11.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 9.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.4s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 4 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₽25,375 7.3 developer hours at ₽3500/hr
Quick wins
₽4,375 3 fixes in ~75 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₽182 052 / month at risk ~₽2 184 625 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

₽182 028 /mo

+30.3pp bounce · ~3,034 lost visitors/mo

CPC: RUB 60.00

Bandwidth Waste

₽24 /mo

3340.5 MB/mo × 7.273 RUB/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~334 KB per page load
    Saves ₽24/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

30
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
82
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.62 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

11.94 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.38 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.103

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

8.81 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

11.94 s

Desktop

64
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
82
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.21 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.19 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

66 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.134

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.75 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.19 s

Categories

8
Avg score 75.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

core-js · 1582 peers
You 72
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Accessibility P5Performance P89Infrastructure P13Compliance P15Sustainability P81Content P77Security P31SEO P40

Top 10% of core-js sites score 71+ on Accessibility; you're at 45 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 35% of core-js sites See full core-js benchmark →
Google Search Console · 3817 peers
You 72
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Accessibility P3Infrastructure P11Compliance P18Content P80Security P23Performance P75Sustainability P66SEO P51

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 71+ on Accessibility; you're at 45 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 31% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console

10 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
ADFOX Liveinternet Yandex.Metrika
Framework
Google Search Console Microsoft Open Graph Vue.js Webpack core-js 3.40.0 jQuery 3.7.1

All Detected Technologies (10)

Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=-Iv_z4DuGXp0sEJcXDvl7Uqj847n0KE7bhG7ODPcKAA
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=F518FAD7B5A53F6B6886EA9CD2F59B2A23661C56

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://vuejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://webpack.js.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

ADFOX is an advertising management platform for media publishers.

Categories Advertising Website https://adfox.yandex.ru Detected by BeaverCheck

LiveInternet is a website analytics service that provides traffic statistics and performance rankings for various websites.

Categories Analytics Website https://liveinternet.ru/rating/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Yandex.Metrica is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://metrika.yandex.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

jQuery loaded alongside a modern framework

Both jQuery and Vue.js are loaded. Modern frameworks handle DOM manipulation natively. jQuery may be unnecessary and adds ~30KB to the page weight. Check the Performance tab for bundle analysis.

→ Performance

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

10 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkommersant.ru)](https://beavercheck.com/results/801860aa-9fb8-406a-ab8a-5bf16e60b852)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/801860aa-9fb8-406a-ab8a-5bf16e60b852"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkommersant.ru" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkommersant.ru

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (81)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (78)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 1 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · 3 image-in-link without alt text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (81)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback