Skip to content
BR · BRL (R$) · Estimated Applicable regulations: LGPD Dev cost: R$ 180/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 22:29 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
46.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

5 categories need attention: Performance, and 4 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Cookie 'cookiesession1' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

Cookie 'openshift-session-persistence-cookie' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 4

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 5

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
5 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

BRL 1,215 investment → BRL 7,751/month returns + BRL 50,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
BRL 1.215
6.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
BRL 7.751
BRL 93.013/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+7555% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided BRL 50.000.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
BRL 6300.1 mo payback · +14664% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
BRL 135 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.

Barriers
9
2 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+31pp
added vs baseline
Score
59
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 28.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 26.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 2.7s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Viewport disables user zoom
    Visitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk
    → Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

R$1,215 6.8 developer hours at R$180/hr
Quick wins
R$135 3 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

R$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

BRL 7.751 / month at risk ~BRL 93.013 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

BRL 50.000.000

LGPD
  • No privacy policy link detected
    LGPD: BRL 10.000 – BRL 50.000.000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    LGPD: BRL 10.000 – BRL 50.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

BRL 7.746 /mo

+31.0pp bounce · ~3,098 lost visitors/mo

CPC: BRL 2.50

Bandwidth Waste

BRL 5,42 /mo

13206.6 MB/mo × 0.410 BRL/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.3 MB per page load
    Saves BRL 5,42/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Categories

8
Avg score 70.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Nginx · 997 peers
You 69
·
Avg 75
-6 below average
0 50 100
SEO P8Performance P12Content P14Infrastructure P19Security P20Compliance P25Sustainability P30Accessibility P67

Top 10% of Nginx sites score 97+ on SEO; you're at 77 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 9% of Nginx sites See full Nginx benchmark →

Technology stack

with Nginx CDN

1 technologies detected 1 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Minimal

Stack Architecture

CDN
Nginx 1.26.1

All Detected Technologies (1)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx/1.26.1
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (1)

Minimal technology footprint

Only 1 technologies detected. This suggests a simple setup with minimal dependencies — excellent for performance and security.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Frj.gov.br)](https://beavercheck.com/results/84b004f1-52d4-46e3-9261-121bb2d1e801)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/84b004f1-52d4-46e3-9261-121bb2d1e801"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Frj.gov.br" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Frj.gov.br

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected C (76)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (75)
  • · Cookie 'cookiesession1' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie 'openshift-session-persistence-cookie' is missing the Secure flag
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → C (76)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback