Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-21 20:11 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
2.1m
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 9.2 MB (7.4 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

No H1 heading found

No H1 means screen-reader users can't identify the page's primary topic, and Google's content-extraction degrades.

Accessibility › Heading Hierarchy
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 19.0s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. The 3 security gaps leave your users exposed — modern browsers increasingly warn visitors about insecure sites. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 19.0s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$642 investment → $6,773/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$642
6.4 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$6,773
$81,273/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+12566% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6250.1 mo payback · +12904% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$42 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~25%.

Barriers
6
1 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+25pp
added vs baseline
Score
75
B
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
0
  • Page takes 19.0s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 16.5s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Thin content
    Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first
    → Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$642 6.4 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$42 2 fixes in ~25 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$6,773 / month at risk ~$81,273 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • No H1 heading found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$6,771 /mo

+25.2pp bounce · ~2,517 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$1.86 /mo

23277.7 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~2.3 MB per page load
    Saves $1.86/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

53
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
58
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

10.18 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

19.04 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

174 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.012

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

10.18 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

19.04 s

Desktop

64
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
54
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.39 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.32 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.006

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.19 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.32 s

Categories

8
Avg score 72.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Amazon Route 53 · 1003 peers
You 71
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Security P2Infrastructure P2Compliance P87Accessibility P86SEO P18Sustainability P22Content P43Performance P57

Top 10% of Amazon Route 53 sites score 74+ on Security; you're at 58 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 23% of Amazon Route 53 sites See full Amazon Route 53 benchmark →
Bootstrap · 885 peers
You 71
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
SEO P2Security P3Infrastructure P3Compliance P89Sustainability P14Accessibility P77Performance P39Content P48

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 97+ on SEO; you're at 79 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 18% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →

Technology stack

Amazon Route 53

10 technologies detected 2 stack layers Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Adobe Experience Platform Launch Microsoft Clarity Tealium
Framework
Amazon Route 53 Bootstrap IBM Carbon Design System Open Graph Priority Hints TrustArc core-js 3.48.0

All Detected Technologies (10)

Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns-359.awsdns-44.com
Categories Framework Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Found 4 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML

IBM Carbon Design System is an open-source design system for building products and digital experiences.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://carbondesignsystem.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

TrustArc provides software and services to help corporations update their privacy management processes so they comply with government laws and best practices.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://trustarc.com Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

Adobe Experience Cloud Launch is an extendable tag management solution for Adobe Experience Cloud, Adobe Experience Platform, and other applications.

Categories Tag managers Website https://docs.adobelaunch.com/getting-started Detected by BeaverCheck

Microsoft's Clarity is a analytics tool which provides website usage statistics, session recording, and heatmaps.

Categories Analytics Website https://clarity.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Tealium provides a sales enterprise tag management system and marketing software.

Categories Tag managers, Customer data platform Website https://tealium.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Amazon Route 53) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

10 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fustream.tv)](https://beavercheck.com/results/8547bc8c-8353-48fb-8d08-b5cc01ed7194)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/8547bc8c-8353-48fb-8d08-b5cc01ed7194"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fustream.tv" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fustream.tv

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected B (81)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → C (77)
  • · Page weighs 9.2 MB (7.4 MB transferred)
  • · No H1 heading found
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (81)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback