Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-22 22:30 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
56.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Cookie 'csrftoken' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 4

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 5

2 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€720 investment → €8,963/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€720
8.0 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€8.963
€107.557/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+14838% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€3150.0 mo payback · +34045% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€45 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

11 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.

Barriers
11
2 crit 9 warn
Bounce delta
+31pp
added vs baseline
Score
53
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
2
Nav
3
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • 345 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • Page loads in 3.9s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 1.4s over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 333ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€720 8.0 developer hours at €90/hr
Quick wins
€45 2 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€6.770 / month at risk ~€81.235 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveDSGVOEAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    DSGVO: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    DSGVO: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    DSGVO: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€6.769 /mo

+30.8pp bounce · ~3,077 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,14 /mo

1927.3 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~193 KB per page load
    Saves €0,14/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

56
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
74
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
75
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.36 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.92 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

333 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.838

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.71 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.63 s

Desktop

81
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
71
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
75
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

463 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

928 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

27 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.364

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

583 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

931 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 75.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 885 peers
You 73
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Security P9Accessibility P11Content P13SEO P16Sustainability P83Performance P80Compliance P57Infrastructure P56

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 75+ on Security; you're at 59 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 39% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
core-js · 1582 peers
You 73
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Sustainability P95Security P6Performance P94Content P9Accessibility P11SEO P20Infrastructure P59Compliance P55

Top 10% of core-js sites score 75+ on Security; you're at 59 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 49% of core-js sites See full core-js benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap, on Python, with Nginx CDN

11 technologies detected 4 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Plausible
Framework
Bootstrap Django Google Search Console Leaflet Mapbox GL JS 2.6.1 Mapbox.js Tailwind CSS core-js 3.6.1
Runtime
Python
CDN
Nginx 1.27.5

All Detected Technologies (11)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx/1.27.5
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Python is an interpreted and general-purpose programming language.

Categories Programming languages Website https://python.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Framework Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 5 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML

Django is a Python-based free and open-source web application framework.

Categories Web frameworks Website https://djangoproject.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=vygxSajCMq3bveWYqZrgBK3NJ0WnhDjhrKsreP2p6VA

Leaflet is the open-source JavaScript library for mobile-friendly interactive maps.

Categories Maps Website https://leafletjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Mapbox GL JS is a JavaScript library that uses WebGL to render interactive maps from vector tiles and Mapbox styles.

Categories Maps Website https://github.com/mapbox/mapbox-gl-js Detected by BeaverCheck

Mapbox.js is a JavaScript library provided by Mapbox for working with interactive maps and geospatial data.

Categories Maps Website https://github.com/mapbox/mapbox.js Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Found 9 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

Plausible is an open-source alternative to Google Analytics.

Categories Analytics Website https://plausible.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffreesound.org)](https://beavercheck.com/results/86a8ed43-763e-418b-9d18-b90608cca0ab)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/86a8ed43-763e-418b-9d18-b90608cca0ab"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffreesound.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffreesound.org

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (82)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → C (78)
  • · Cookie 'csrftoken' is missing the Secure flag
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → B (82)
  • · 2 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback