Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-21 20:30 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
55.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 6.6 MB (4.9 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

1 image-only link(s) without alt text

Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 11.3s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 11.3s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€574 investment → €9,719/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€574
6.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€9.719
€116.629/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+20227% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5310.1 mo payback · +21854% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€64 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
8
2 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
62
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
2
  • Page takes 11.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 8.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 54 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 345ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€574 6.8 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€64 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€6.377 / month at risk ~€76.528 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • No <main> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Multiple H1 headings (3 found)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€6.376 /mo

+29.0pp bounce · ~2,898 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€1,15 /mo

15478.4 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.5 MB per page load
    Saves €1,15/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

62
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
89
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.99 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

11.26 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

345 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.99 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

13.80 s

Desktop

76
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
89
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.39 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.54 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

19 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.003

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.39 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.72 s

Categories

8
Avg score 73.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Amazon Route 53 · 1018 peers
You 72
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P84Security P23SEO P27Content P27Compliance P57Performance P44Accessibility P44Sustainability P48

Top 10% of Amazon Route 53 sites score 75+ on Security; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 34% of Amazon Route 53 sites See full Amazon Route 53 benchmark →
Google Search Console · 3888 peers
You 72
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Security P23Infrastructure P74Sustainability P29SEO P31Content P34Performance P35Accessibility P37Compliance P62

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 79+ on Security; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 30% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Amazon Route 53, on Caddy/Go, with Imgix CDN

16 technologies detected 5 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager HubSpot HubSpot Analytics
Framework
Amazon Route 53 Google Search Console Google Workspace HTTP/3 Nuxt.js Open Graph Pinia Tailwind CSS Vue.js
Runtime
Go
Server
Caddy
CDN
Imgix

All Detected Technologies (16)

Imgix is a visual media platform for managing, processing, rendering, optimising and delivering your existing images.

Categories CDN, Digital asset management Website https://imgix.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Caddy is a Go-based web server known for its simplicity and automatic HTTPS features.

Categories Web servers Website https://caddyserver.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Caddy
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Go is an open source high-level programming language.

Categories Programming languages Website https://go.dev Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns-746.awsdns-29.net
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=1GQaXgxj7q2sj-bEF1ikLGKD_-bmRdQWsA4LZBke5xo
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: smtp.google.com

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Nuxt is a Vue framework for developing modern web applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Static site generator Website https://nuxt.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Pinia is a state management library for Vue.js.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://pinia.vuejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 248 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://vuejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-FN940L7CL7&cx=c&gtm=4e64h1

HubSpot is a marketing and sales software that helps companies attract visitors, convert leads, and close customers.

Categories Marketing automation Website https://www.hubspot.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains js.hs-scripts.com: //js.hs-scripts.com/44783791.js

HubSpot is a marketing and sales software that helps companies attract visitors, convert leads, and close customers.

Categories Analytics Website https://www.hubspot.com/products/marketing/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Amazon Route 53) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

16 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitea.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/gitea.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/gitea.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitea.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitea.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (82)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (78)
  • · Page weighs 6.6 MB (4.9 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 1 image-only link(s) without alt text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (82)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback