Skip to content
https://unmineablefrn.wordpress.com Export & share
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
77
TTFB stable →
162ms
FCP stable →
3.3s
LCP stable →
4.5s
Scanned
2026-10-24 06:53 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
45.00s
Vs prev
Improved by +1

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Strong global performance — average 174ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (43ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (432ms). No CDN (document or assets). Cache-Control header is missing.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
162ms
DNS 52ms · TLS 6ms
United States - Santa Clara
43ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 11ms
United Stated - New York
66ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 8ms
Singapore - Singapore
191ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 7ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
147ms
DNS 6ms · TLS 10ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
432ms
DNS 6ms · TLS 8ms
CDN: No CDN (document or assets) · Avg TTFB: 174ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

wordpress.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

1 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 3

3 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 4

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Critical: 5

No H1 heading found

No H1 means screen-reader users can't identify the page's primary topic, and Google's content-extraction degrades.

Accessibility › Heading Hierarchy
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
4 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$483 investment → $6,942/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$483
4.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$6,942
$83,308/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+17136% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$450 → 0.1 mo payback · +18413% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$83 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.

Barriers
8
2 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+30pp
added vs baseline
Score
62
C
Speed
1
Trust
1
Usability
2
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 4.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 2.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 3 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Viewport disables user zoom
    Visitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk
    → Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$483 4.8 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$83 3 fixes in ~50 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$3,519 / month at risk ~$42,231 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • 1 advertising/retargeting trackers detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$3,519 /mo

+30.3pp bounce · ~3,034 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 1.16

Bandwidth Waste

$0.05 /mo

653.9 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~65 KB per page load
    Saves $0.05/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

77
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
90
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
66
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.34 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.54 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

28 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.34 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.57 s

Desktop

97
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
66
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

951 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.01 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.00 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.01 s

Categories

8
Avg score 80.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

WooCommerce · 248 peers
You 81
·
Avg 79
At average
0 50 100
Better than 56% of WooCommerce sites See full WooCommerce benchmark →
WordPress · 1099 peers
You 81
·
Avg 77
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P12Content P13SEO P21Performance P79Sustainability P78Accessibility P66Compliance P35Security P63

Top 10% of WordPress sites score 97+ on Infrastructure; you're at 83 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 73% of WordPress sites See full WordPress benchmark →

Technology stack

WordPress, on PHP, with Nginx CDN

13 technologies detected 6 stack layers 5 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Ads Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Ecommerce
WooCommerce
CMS
WordPress
Framework
Bulma Google Font API HSTS MySQL RSS jQuery 3.7.1 jQuery Migrate 3.4.1
Runtime
PHP
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (13)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.

Categories CMS, Blogs Website https://wordpress.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://s0.wp.com/wp-content/mu-plugins/a8c-analytics/a8c-analytics.js?v=1790640935, Link URL: https://s1.wp.com/wp-content/themes/h4/style.css?27
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Ecommerce Website https://woocommerce.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Body: woocommerce class/marker present
Categories Framework Website https://bulma.io Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 5 Bulma class patterns in HTML

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

MySQL is an open-source relational database management system.

Categories Databases Website https://mysql.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Query Migrate is a javascript library that allows you to preserve the compatibility of your jQuery code developed for versions of jQuery older than 1.9.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/jquery/jquery-migrate Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Ads is an online advertising platform developed by Google.

Categories Advertising Website https://ads.google.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Ads Conversion Tracking is a free tool that shows you what happens after a customer interacts with your ads.

Categories Analytics Website https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/1722022 Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

WordPress detected — review security configuration

WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Bulma) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

13 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Funmineablefrn.wordpress.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/wordpress.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/wordpress.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Funmineablefrn.wordpress.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Funmineablefrn.wordpress.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 5h total → projected B (87)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (84)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · No H1 heading found
  • · 1 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 4h → B (87)
  • · 3 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback