Skip to content
Scanned
2026-10-24 18:16 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
46.00s
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

High global latency — average 1636ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (151ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (4597ms). No CDN (document or assets). 5 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
790ms
DNS 113ms · TLS 166ms
United States - Santa Clara
151ms
DNS 59ms · TLS 25ms
United Stated - New York
1053ms
DNS 828ms · TLS 67ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
1457ms
DNS 1001ms · TLS 145ms
Singapore - Singapore
1768ms
DNS 1157ms · TLS 196ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
4597ms
DNS 1043ms · TLS 1638ms
CDN: No CDN (document or assets) · Avg TTFB: 1636ms · Cache: max-age=600

Audit overview

Accessibility and Compliance need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

asetka.org fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

11 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 4

9 image-in-link without alt text

Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 5

9 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$575 investment → $9,444/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$575
5.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$9,444
$113,328/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+19609% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$475 → 0.1 mo payback · +23759% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$125 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~32%.

Barriers
9
1 crit 8 warn
Bounce delta
+32pp
added vs baseline
Score
66
C
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
2
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • Page loads in 2.9s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 414ms over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$575 5.8 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$125 3 fixes in ~75 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$8,664 / month at risk ~$103,971 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy found (page links and common paths checked)
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$8,664 /mo

+32.2pp bounce · ~3,221 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.05 /mo

599.5 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~60 KB per page load
    Saves $0.05/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

93
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
48
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.54 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.91 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.077

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.54 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.91 s

Desktop

88
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
48
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

934 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.44 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.153

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

934 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.44 s

Categories

8
Avg score 78.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Apache · 546 peers
You 80
·
Avg 74
+6 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P4Performance P91Sustainability P88Security P85SEO P22Infrastructure P34Accessibility P65Content P41

Top 10% of Apache sites score 84+ on Compliance; you're at 61 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 85% of Apache sites See full Apache benchmark →
Google Analytics · 2366 peers
You 80
·
Avg 74
+6 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Performance P98SEO P6Sustainability P89Content P14Infrastructure P18Security P81Accessibility P62

Top 10% of Google Analytics sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 61 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 81% of Google Analytics sites See full Google Analytics benchmark →

Technology stack

Apache, hosted on Apache HTTP Server

3 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics
Server
Apache
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server

All Detected Technologies (3)

Categories Server Website https://httpd.apache.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Apache

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (0)

No specific observations.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.asetka.org%2Findex.shtml)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/asetka.org)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/asetka.org"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.asetka.org%2Findex.shtml" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.asetka.org%2Findex.shtml

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected B (88)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (85)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 9 image-in-link without alt text
  • · 9 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 4h → B (88)
  • · 11 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback