Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓High global latency — average 1423ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (416ms), slowest from Amsterdam (2899ms). Assets on Cloudflare (host wsv3cdn.audioeye.com, 7 assets); document served directly from origin. 5 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
Sustainability needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Your mail setup has problems.
rescueairtx.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.
Top Priorities (5)
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
Page weighs 23.2 MB (14.2 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
Wildcard '*' found in script source
script-src * defeats the entire point of CSP — any host can load scripts on your page.
1 button(s) with no accessible text
Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€1,148 investment → €1,351/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
3 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~13%.
- Page feels frozen for 1.2sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- 1 form field(s) without a labelScreen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes→ Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
- 1 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€20.500.000
- 3 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedGDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- 4 of 4 <nav> elements are unlabeledEAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
- 3 image(s) with generic alt textEAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€1.347 /mo
+12.5pp bounce · ~1,255 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 1.07
Bandwidth Waste
€3,30 /mo
44567.9 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~4.5 MB per page loadSaves €3,30/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.91 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.91 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
1.18 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.005
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
3.94 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
29.98 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.08 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.08 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
34 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.006
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.83 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
5.70 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 23.2 MB (14.2 MB transferred)
Security
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Accessibility
1 button(s) with no accessible text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Technology stack
Scorpion
Stack Architecture
Amazon Advertising 
Facebook Pixel 2.9.398
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
Innovid Advertising Measurement 
TVSquared 
Amazon Webstore 
Scorpion 
WordPress 
AudioEye Facebook SDK HSTS 
Open Graph 
core-js 3.32.2All Detected Technologies (14)
Scorpion is a marketing and technology provider.
Amazon Webstore is an all-in-one hosted ecommerce website solution.
AudioEye is an accessibility overlay which claims to provide ADA and WCAG accessibility compliance.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
Amazon Advertising (formerly AMS or Amazon Marketing Services) is a service that works in a similar way to pay-per-click ads on Google.
Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Innovid Advertising Measurement is a solution for assessing and analyzing the performance of advertising campaigns across different platforms and devices.
TVSquared is a cross-platform TV ad measurement, analytics and optimisation platform.
Observations (3)
WordPress detected — review security configuration
WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.
No build tool detected
A framework (AudioEye) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
14 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/rescueairtx.com)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/rescueairtx.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rescueairtx.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rescueairtx.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
3 sprints · 14h total → projected A (90)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+4Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 23.2 MB (14.2 MB transferred)
- · 1 button(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+2Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Wildcard '*' found in script source
Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements
+3Higher effort, long-term payoff
- · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
- · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source