Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-22 23:58 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
49.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

Accessibility needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

1 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Warning: 2

38 third-party resources (96% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 3

Cookie 'JSESSIONID' is missing the HttpOnly flag

Without HttpOnly, JavaScript can read the cookie — an XSS bug becomes a session-stealing attack.

Security › Cookie Security
Warning: 4

Cookie 'bcookie' is missing the HttpOnly flag

Without HttpOnly, JavaScript can read the cookie — an XSS bug becomes a session-stealing attack.

Security › Cookie Security
Warning: 5

Cookie 'lang' is missing the HttpOnly flag

Without HttpOnly, JavaScript can read the cookie — an XSS bug becomes a session-stealing attack.

Security › Cookie Security
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 3.3s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your audience reach.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 3.3s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$225 investment → $7,981/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$225
2.3 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$7,981
$95,773/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+42466% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$2000.0 mo payback · +47787% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$75 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~24%.

Barriers
7
2 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+24pp
added vs baseline
Score
65
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page feels frozen for 875ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 101 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • Page loads in 3.3s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 763ms over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$225 2.3 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$75 3 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$6,545 / month at risk ~$78,537 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$6,545 /mo

+24.3pp bounce · ~2,433 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.19 /mo

2359.0 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~236 KB per page load
    Saves $0.19/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 1 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

71
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.91 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.26 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

875 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.040

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.91 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

7.36 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

539 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

699 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

36 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.002

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

539 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

717 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 75.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Azure Front Door · 33 peers
You 75
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Better than 54% of Azure Front Door sites See full Azure Front Door benchmark →
HSTS · 2556 peers
You 75
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P6Content P30SEO P31Performance P68Sustainability P35Security P60Accessibility P43Compliance P49

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 80 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 48% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Azure Front Door, on Java, hosted on Azure, with Azure CDN CDN

12 technologies detected 5 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Linkedin Insight Tag Linkedin Sign-in Microsoft Power BI Naver Analytics Tealium
Framework
Azure Front Door HSTS Open Graph Tailwind CSS
Runtime
Java
CDN
Azure CDN
Hosting
Azure

All Detected Technologies (12)

Categories CDN Website https://azure.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-azure-ref: 20260422T235720Z-17f8b87f6bfrbcrvhC1BY15gg00000000er0000000002v9m

Azure is a cloud computing service for building, testing, deploying, and managing applications and services through Microsoft-managed data centers.

Categories PaaS Website https://azure.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-azure-ref

Java is a class-based, object-oriented programming language that is designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible.

Categories Programming languages Website https://java.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Azure Front Door is a scalable and secure entry point for fast delivery of your global web applications.

Categories Load balancers Website https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/frontdoor/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 114 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

LinkedIn Insight Tag is a lightweight JavaScript tag that powers conversion tracking, website audiences, and website demographics.

Categories Analytics Website https://business.linkedin.com/marketing-solutions/insight-tag Detected by BeaverCheck

Linkedin Sign-In is an authentication system that reduces the burden of login for users, by enabling them to sign in with their Linkedin account.

Categories Authentication Website https://www.linkedin.com/developers Detected by BeaverCheck

Microsoft Power BI is a data analytics platform that transforms company data into rich visuals for insights and decision-making.

Categories Analytics Website https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/power-platform/products/power-bi Detected by BeaverCheck

Naver Analytics is a Korean based analytics service.

Categories Analytics Website https://analytics.naver.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Tealium provides a sales enterprise tag management system and marketing software.

Categories Tag managers, Customer data platform Website https://tealium.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Azure Front Door) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

12 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftr.linkedin.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/8a9e0b25-b363-42dd-a100-82130151f588)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/8a9e0b25-b363-42dd-a100-82130151f588"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftr.linkedin.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftr.linkedin.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 2h total → projected B (80)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → C (79)
  • · 38 third-party resources (96% of weight)
  • · Cookie 'JSESSIONID' is missing the HttpOnly flag
  • · Cookie 'bcookie' is missing the HttpOnly flag
  • · Cookie 'lang' is missing the HttpOnly flag

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 2h → B (80)
  • · 1 image(s) missing alt attribute

Send Feedback