Skip to content
Scanned
2026-05-10 14:00 UTC
Worker
🇧🇷 Sao Paulo
Duration
1.2m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 1045ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (49ms), slowest from Singapore (2398ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 5 locations above the 500ms target.

Brazil - Sao Paulo
Full audit
1270ms
DNS 921ms · TLS 121ms
United Stated - New York
49ms
DNS 28ms · TLS 8ms
United States - Santa Clara
759ms
DNS 537ms · TLS 76ms
Spain - Madrid
878ms
DNS 576ms · TLS 102ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
917ms
DNS 678ms · TLS 84ms
Singapore - Singapore
2398ms
DNS 1677ms · TLS 243ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 1045ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

/.svn/entries is publicly accessible

Sensitive resource publicly accessible — restrict access or remove.

Security › Information Leakage
Critical: 2

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

1 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€652 investment → €11,467/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€652
7.7 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€11,467
€137,604/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+21016% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 20,500,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5950.1 mo payback · +23027% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€57 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.

Barriers
7
2 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+28pp
added vs baseline
Score
65
C
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
2
  • Page takes 8.8s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 6.3s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 8 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€652 7.7 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€57 2 fixes in ~40 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

€1,714,391 / month at risk ~€20,572,698 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€20,500,000

GDPREAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    GDPR: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    GDPR: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • No <main> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • Heading level skipped: H1 → H5 (missing H2)
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€6,057 /mo

+27.5pp bounce · ~2,753 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0.75 /mo

10141.1 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.0 MB per page load
    Saves €0.75/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

73
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
88
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.66 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

8.78 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

34 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.60 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

8.79 s

Desktop

91
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
94
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

614 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.85 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

13 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.19 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.85 s

Categories

8
Avg score 76.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 855 peers
You 80
·
Avg 73
+7 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P99Content P4Accessibility P94Infrastructure P10Performance P82SEO P22Sustainability P46

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 92% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
Bootstrap Icons · 30 peers
You 80
·
Avg 73
+7 above average
0 50 100
Better than 86% of Bootstrap Icons sites See full Bootstrap Icons benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap 5.3.8, on Apache, hosted on Apache HTTP Server

8 technologies detected 3 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Bootstrap 5.3.8 Bootstrap Icons .HSTS Microsoft 365 Tailwind CSS jQuery 3.7.1
Server
Apache
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server

All Detected Technologies (8)

Categories Server Website https://httpd.apache.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Apache

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Stylesheet: ./css/bootstrap.min.css
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Bootstrap Icons is a growing library of SVG icons that are designed by @mdo and maintained by the Bootstrap Team.

Categories Font scripts Website https://icons.getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: thespider-com0i.mail.protection.outlook.com
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Found 6 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fthe-spider.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/8b0d80fb-d12a-4889-99bf-4475fbbecf8a)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/8b0d80fb-d12a-4889-99bf-4475fbbecf8a"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fthe-spider.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fthe-spider.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (87)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → B (83)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · 1 button(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → B (87)
  • · /.svn/entries is publicly accessible
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback