Skip to content
IT · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: GDPR · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €55/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
100
TTFB stable →
1.4s
FCP stable →
1.0s
LCP stable →
1.1s
Scanned
2026-08-18 16:45 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
56.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 9119ms across 6 locations, fastest from Madrid (1060ms), slowest from New York (22542ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 6 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
1060ms
DNS 68ms · TLS 38ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
19065ms
DNS 69ms · TLS 31ms
United Stated - New York
22542ms
DNS 330ms · TLS 104ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
5015ms
DNS 744ms · TLS 212ms
Singapore - Singapore
4017ms
DNS 345ms · TLS 165ms
United States - Santa Clara
3014ms
DNS 320ms · TLS 174ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 9119ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

ordinemedicilatina.it fails 2 mail checks: DMARC policy is none — monitoring only, SPF evaluation problem: exceeded RFC 7208 10-lookup limit (counted 12 lookup(s)). This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page body has only 56 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Empty Page Detection
Critical: 5

Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)

Missing <html lang> attribute -- screen readers default to the user's system language and pronounce content with the wrong phonetics.

Accessibility › Document Language
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€376 investment → €3,118/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€376
6.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€3.118
€37.418/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+9856% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€3440.1 mo payback · +10785% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€46 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~14%.

Barriers
6
6 warn
Bounce delta
+14pp
added vs baseline
Score
82
B
Speed
0
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
1
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Thin content
    Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first
    → Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€376 6.8 developer hours at €55/hr
Quick wins
€46 3 fixes in ~50 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€3.118 / month at risk ~€37.418 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveGDPREAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€3.118 /mo

+14.2pp bounce · ~1,417 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,00 /mo

52.9 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~5 KB per page load
    Saves €0,00/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Categories

8
Avg score 78.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

WordPress · 918 peers
You 82
·
Avg 76
+6 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Performance P97SEO P8Security P92Infrastructure P17Content P17Accessibility P77Sustainability P47

Top 10% of WordPress sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 60 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 85% of WordPress sites See full WordPress benchmark →
Google Search Console · 4127 peers
You 82
·
Avg 74
+8 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Performance P96Security P89Accessibility P86Infrastructure P22SEO P28Content P37Sustainability P54

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 60 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 90% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

WordPress, on PHP, with Nginx CDN

7 technologies detected 4 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

CMS
WordPress
Framework
Google Search Console Microsoft Microsoft 365 MySQL
Runtime
PHP
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (7)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.

Categories CMS, Blogs Website https://wordpress.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header link contains wp-json
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=clqLLhCu75JhMtMpejnVP9fsEVmyG9MMBo0Zff-BcaI
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms46187941
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: ordinemedicilatina-it.mail.protection.outlook.com

MySQL is an open-source relational database management system.

Categories Databases Website https://mysql.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (2)

WordPress detected — review security configuration

WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fordinemedicilatina.it)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/ordinemedicilatina.it)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/ordinemedicilatina.it"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fordinemedicilatina.it" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fordinemedicilatina.it

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (88)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (88)
  • · Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · Page body has only 56 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (88)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback