Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓High global latency — average 621ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (124ms), slowest from Singapore (1156ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 3 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
3 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 2 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
1 image(s) missing alt attribute
Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.
No <main> landmark found
Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.
External link from o2swit.ch lacks integrity attribute
External resource without SRI — if the third-party CDN is compromised, your site executes attacker-controlled code.
Page weight 1.6 MB exceeds 1 MB target by 611 KB
Page weight over the 1 MB target — image optimization is usually the biggest single lever.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€973 investment → €3,377/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~15%.
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- Viewport disables user zoomVisitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk→ Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2
- No Open Graph tagsLinks shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop→ Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
- No structured dataNo rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices→ Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
- Thin contentUnder 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first→ Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120,500,000
- No privacy policy link detectedRGPD: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundRGPD: EUR 5,000 – EUR 10,000,000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundRGPD: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundePrivacy Directive: EUR 5,000 – EUR 100,000,000
- Trackers detected but no privacy policy foundRGPD: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
- Privacy Policy not detectedRGPD: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
- No <main> landmark foundEAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
- No <nav> landmark foundEAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
- Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
- 1 image(s) missing alt attributeEAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€3,377 /mo
+15.3pp bounce · ~1,535 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 2.20
Bandwidth Waste
€0.37 /mo
5021.2 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~502 KB per page loadSaves €0.37/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.04 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.04 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
40 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.09 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
1.18 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
263 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
269 ms
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
441 ms
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
270 ms
Categories
8Performance
Page weight 1.6 MB exceeds 1 MB target by 611 KB
Security
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Accessibility
1 image(s) missing alt attribute
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Font Awesome sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 72 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 72 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Font Awesome 5.15.3, with Cloudflare CDN
Stack Architecture
Font Awesome 5.15.3Google Search Console HSTS 
jQuery 3.6.1
Cloudflare 
cdnjs All Detected Technologies (6)
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
cdnjs is a free distributed JS library delivery service.
Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Observations (1)
No build tool detected
A framework (Font Awesome) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/8c407948-5082-419f-b1dd-2ecc1159ad2c)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/8c407948-5082-419f-b1dd-2ecc1159ad2c"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmymoonova.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmymoonova.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
3 sprints · 12h total → projected B (87)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+3Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · No <main> landmark found
- · External link from o2swit.ch lacks integrity attribute
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+2Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 1 image(s) missing alt attribute
- · Page weight 1.6 MB exceeds 1 MB target by 611 KB
Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements
+3Higher effort, long-term payoff
- · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source