Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance improving ↑
88
TTFB improving ↑
134ms
FCP improving ↑
2.2s
LCP improving ↑
3.1s
Scanned
2026-05-08 18:33 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
50.00s
Vs prev
Improved by +1

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Excellent global latency — average 43ms across 6 locations, fastest from Sao Paulo (15ms), slowest from Madrid (111ms). Vercel edge cache (HIT).

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
111ms
DNS 29ms · TLS 35ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
38ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 18ms
United States - Santa Clara
20ms
DNS 4ms · TLS 9ms
United Stated - New York
32ms
DNS 6ms · TLS 17ms
Singapore - Singapore
45ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 7ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
15ms
DNS 4ms · TLS 6ms
CDN: Vercel (HIT) · Avg TTFB: 43ms · Cache: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

1

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

4

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Warning: 3

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 4

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

COOP isolates your top-level browsing context from cross-origin windows — without it, popup-based side-channel attacks remain possible.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 5

JavaScript is 510 KB — consider code splitting or lazy loading

JavaScript bundle is large — code-split routes and lazy-load off-screen components to defer.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 5.8s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 5.8s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$2,125 investment → $11,070/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$2,125
21.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$11,070
$132,838/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+6151% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$1,3000.1 mo payback · +10118% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$25 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.

Barriers
8
1 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+28pp
added vs baseline
Score
69
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
4
Nav
1
  • Page takes 5.8s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.3s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 389ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$2,125 21.3 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$25 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

$20,730 / month at risk ~$248,758 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No headings found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$7,605 /mo

+28.3pp bounce · ~2,827 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.20 /mo

2550.9 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~255 KB per page load
    Saves $0.20/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Categories

8
Avg score 80.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 3770 peers
You 82
·
Avg 73
+9 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P97Accessibility P94Sustainability P91Performance P89SEO P18Content P35Infrastructure P54

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 95% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
Google Workspace · 1751 peers
You 82
·
Avg 74
+8 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P98Accessibility P95Sustainability P90Performance P87SEO P19Content P37Infrastructure P46

Top 10% of Google Workspace sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 96% of Google Workspace sites See full Google Workspace benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console, hosted on Next.js, with Vercel Edge CDN

8 technologies detected 3 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS React Webpack
CDN
Vercel Edge
Hosting
Next.js Vercel

All Detected Technologies (8)

Categories CDN Website https://vercel.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-vercel-id: cdg1::pdx1::77jgq-1778265152395-382bd28bd3e2

Next.js is a React framework for developing single page Javascript applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator Website https://nextjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence X-Powered-By: Next.js in redirect
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Vercel is a cloud platform for static frontends and serverless functions.

Categories PaaS Website https://vercel.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-vercel-id, Server: Vercel
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=h7m7xPSl46-ALWigMUJfFFOFZjKe3jZECHyXSomzXvM
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://webpack.js.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnextjs.org)](https://beavercheck.com/results/8ebe94a5-a6cb-44af-a79d-0b318f14a21b)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/8ebe94a5-a6cb-44af-a79d-0b318f14a21b"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnextjs.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnextjs.org

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 21h total → projected B (86)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+1

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

1 findings 0h → B (83)
  • · Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 1h → B (84)
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+2

Higher effort, long-term payoff

3 findings 20h → B (86)
  • · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source
  • · JavaScript is 510 KB — consider code splitting or lazy loading

Send Feedback