Skip to content
GB · GBP (£) · Estimated Applicable regulations: UK GDPR · PECR · Equality Act 2010 Dev cost: £75/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-05-10 12:29 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
45.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 644ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (230ms), slowest from Singapore (968ms). Cloudflare in front. Cache-Control header is missing. 5 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
802ms
DNS 51ms · TLS 26ms
United Stated - New York
230ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 9ms
United States - Santa Clara
511ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 10ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
824ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 21ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
531ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 10ms
Singapore - Singapore
968ms
DNS 14ms · TLS 18ms
CDN: Cloudflare · Avg TTFB: 644ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 24.8 MB (24.5 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

1 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 10.7s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 10.7s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

£506 investment → £9,738/month returns + GBP 17,550,000 risk avoided

Investment
£506
6.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
£9,738
£116,858/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+22983% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided GBP 17,550,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
£4690.0 mo payback · +24830% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
£56 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
9
1 crit 8 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
66
C
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
4
Nav
1
  • Page takes 10.7s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 8.2s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 1 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

£506 6.8 developer hours at £75/hr
Quick wins
£56 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

£ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

£1,468,591 / month at risk ~£17,623,094 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

£17,550,000

UK GDPREquality Act 2010
  • No privacy policy link detected
    UK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    UK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
  • No <main> landmark found
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • Heading level skipped: H1 → H5 (missing H2)
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • 1 control(s) without accessible label
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

£6,086 /mo

+29.0pp bounce · ~2,898 lost visitors/mo

CPC: GBP 2.10

Bandwidth Waste

£4.85 /mo

76986.5 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~7.7 MB per page load
    Saves £4.85/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

71
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.47 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

10.75 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.56 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

10.75 s

Desktop

75
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

526 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

11.45 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.004

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

526 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

11.45 s

Categories

8
Avg score 78.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

HTTP/3 · 1402 peers
You 81
·
Avg 75
+6 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P95Accessibility P93Sustainability P23Performance P68Content P37SEO P58Infrastructure P57

Top 10% of HTTP/3 sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 91% of HTTP/3 sites See full HTTP/3 benchmark →
Cloudflare · 2006 peers
You 81
·
Avg 74
+7 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P95Accessibility P95Performance P75Sustainability P26Content P37SEO P55Infrastructure P53

Top 10% of Cloudflare sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 93% of Cloudflare sites See full Cloudflare benchmark →

Technology stack

HTTP/3, with Cloudflare CDN

2 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Minimal

Stack Architecture

Framework
HTTP/3
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (2)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (HTTP/3) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Minimal technology footprint

Only 2 technologies detected. This suggests a simple setup with minimal dependencies — excellent for performance and security.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpictures.loowis.co.uk)](https://beavercheck.com/results/8f7ce4aa-90ae-42cf-851e-258fb15ca16b)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/8f7ce4aa-90ae-42cf-851e-258fb15ca16b"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpictures.loowis.co.uk" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpictures.loowis.co.uk

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (88)
  • · Page weighs 24.8 MB (24.5 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 1 button(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → A (90)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback