Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
63
TTFB stable →
59ms
FCP stable →
3.6s
LCP stable →
6.0s
Scanned
2026-07-19 21:32 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
30.00s
Vs prev
no change

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 201ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (78ms), slowest from Singapore (334ms). Vercel in front.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
225ms
DNS 35ms · TLS 38ms
United Stated - New York
78ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 22ms
United States - Santa Clara
137ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 12ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
198ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 25ms
Singapore - Singapore
334ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 56ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
232ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 59ms
CDN: Vercel · Avg TTFB: 201ms · Cache: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page body has only 168 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Empty Page Detection
Critical: 4

Page weighs 8.0 MB (6.8 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

No favicon or icon links detected

Without a favicon, your tab shows a blank icon and bookmarks look unbranded — amateur signal in every browser surface.

Accessibility › Favicon & Branding
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 8.0s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 8.0s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$700 investment → $13,416/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$700
7.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$13,416
$160,992/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+22899% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6500.0 mo payback · +24668% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$100 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.

Barriers
8
1 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+28pp
added vs baseline
Score
69
C
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
4
Nav
1
  • Page takes 8.0s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 5.5s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$700 7.0 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$100 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$7,408 / month at risk ~$88,899 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$7,407 /mo

+27.5pp bounce · ~2,753 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$1.72 /mo

21452.7 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~2.1 MB per page load
    Saves $1.72/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Categories

8
Avg score 78.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

HSTS · 2639 peers
You 80
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P4Accessibility P90Security P83Infrastructure P23SEO P29Content P35Performance P65Sustainability P48

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 80% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →
Vercel Edge · 88 peers
You 80
·
Avg 76
At average
0 50 100
Better than 68% of Vercel Edge sites See full Vercel Edge benchmark →

Technology stack

HSTS, hosted on Vercel, with Vercel Edge CDN

3 technologies detected 3 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
HSTS
CDN
Vercel Edge
Hosting
Vercel

All Detected Technologies (3)

Categories CDN Website https://vercel.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-vercel-id: cdg1::fk5j9-1784496703761-da10cc88b82c

Vercel is a cloud platform for static frontends and serverless functions.

Categories PaaS Website https://vercel.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-vercel-id, Server: Vercel

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbcwc.cloud)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/bcwc.cloud)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/bcwc.cloud"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbcwc.cloud" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbcwc.cloud

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (86)
  • · Page weighs 8.0 MB (6.8 MB transferred)
  • · Page body has only 168 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder
  • · No favicon or icon links detected

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (89)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback