Audit overview
Security and Accessibility need attention; the other categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
1High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
4High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
1 image(s) missing alt attribute
Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.
2 control(s) without accessible label
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
BRL 1,575 investment → BRL 6,104/month returns + BRL 50,000,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~33%.
- Page takes 5.9s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 3.4s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 1.3sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- 4 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
BRL 50.000.000
- No privacy policy link detectedLGPD: BRL 10.000 – BRL 50.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundLGPD: BRL 10.000 – BRL 50.000.000
- Trackers detected but no privacy policy foundLGPD: BRL 10.000 – BRL 50.000.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
BRL 1.968 /mo
+32.8pp bounce · ~3,279 lost visitors/mo
CPC: BRL 0.60
Bandwidth Waste
BRL 3,92 /mo
9558.9 MB/mo × 0.410 BRL/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~956 KB per page loadSaves BRL 3,92/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
4.28 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
5.90 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
1.27 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.042
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
10.50 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
18.05 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.24 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
3.79 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
116 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.032
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
4.08 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
4.92 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
1 image(s) missing alt attribute
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 94+ on Infrastructure; you're at 75 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Joomla
Stack Architecture
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
Microsoft Clarity 
Cart Functionality 
Font Awesome 
Google Font API Microsoft Microsoft 365 
Pure CSS 
jQuery 3.4.1
jQuery UI 1.13.1All Detected Technologies (13)
Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.
Chosen is a jQuery plugin that makes long, unwieldy select boxes much more user-friendly.
Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
Pure CSS is a set of small, responsive CSS modules that can be used in web projects.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
jQuery UI is a collection of GUI widgets, animated visual effects, and themes implemented with jQuery, Cascading Style Sheets, and HTML.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Microsoft's Clarity is a analytics tool which provides website usage statistics, session recording, and heatmaps.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Chosen) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
13 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/8ffabecb-6a31-46a2-b486-71961101c817)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/8ffabecb-6a31-46a2-b486-71961101c817"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fibge.gov.br" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fibge.gov.brExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 9h total → projected C (79)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+2Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · HSTS header is missing
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+7Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 2 control(s) without accessible label
- · 1 image(s) missing alt attribute
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found