Skip to content
Scanned
2026-05-18 13:46 UTC
Worker
🇸🇬 Singapore
Duration
1.3m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 606ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (363ms), slowest from Singapore (772ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC). Cache-Control header is missing. 5 locations above the 500ms target.

Singapore - Singapore
Full audit
772ms
DNS 17ms · TLS 15ms
United States - Santa Clara
585ms
DNS 13ms · TLS 11ms
Spain - Madrid
501ms
DNS 43ms · TLS 23ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
363ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 11ms
United Stated - New York
687ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 9ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
725ms
DNS 18ms · TLS 12ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 606ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

1

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

4

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

No H1 heading found

No H1 means screen-reader users can't identify the page's primary topic, and Google's content-extraction degrades.

Accessibility › Heading Hierarchy
Warning: 4

1 font preload(s) missing `crossorigin` -- font will be downloaded twice

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › Resource Hints
Warning: 5

127 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 19.5s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 19.5s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

DKK 7,908 investment → DKK 46,746/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
DKK 7.908
12.2 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
DKK 46.746
DKK 560.957/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+6993% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
DKK 4.0080.1 mo payback · +13895% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
DKK 108 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
8
1 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
69
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
2
  • Page takes 19.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 17.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 328ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Thin content
    Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first
    → Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

kr7,908 12.2 developer hours at kr650/hr
Quick wins
kr108 1 fixes in ~10 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

kr /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

DKK 46.746 / month at risk ~DKK 560.957 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveGDPREAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    GDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

DKK 46.744 /mo

+29.2pp bounce · ~2,921 lost visitors/mo

CPC: DKK 16.00

Bandwidth Waste

DKK 2,84 /mo

5150.0 MB/mo × 0.552 DKK/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~515 KB per page load
    Saves DKK 2,84/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

48
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
69
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

15.33 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

19.54 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

328 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

15.33 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

23.12 s

Desktop

57
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
69
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.87 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.44 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

94 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.87 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.96 s

Categories

8
Avg score 80.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

HSTS · 2494 peers
You 82
·
Avg 75
+7 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P93Accessibility P93Performance P65Infrastructure P65Sustainability P60Content P41SEO P49

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 59 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 89% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →
HTTP/3 · 1454 peers
You 82
·
Avg 75
+7 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P95Accessibility P93SEO P58Infrastructure P57Performance P56Sustainability P45Content P46

Top 10% of HTTP/3 sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 59 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 90% of HTTP/3 sites See full HTTP/3 benchmark →

Technology stack

HSTS, with Cloudflare CDN

9 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Framework
HSTS HTTP/3 Nuxt UI Nuxt.js Open Graph Pinia Priority Hints Vue.js
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (9)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Nuxt UI is a customizable UI library designed for Nuxt.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://ui.nuxt.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Nuxt is a Vue framework for developing modern web applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Static site generator Website https://nuxt.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Pinia is a state management library for Vue.js.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://pinia.vuejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://vuejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

9 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnorriq.shop)](https://beavercheck.com/results/90338a39-341b-46ae-85e2-6cc273cda19f)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/90338a39-341b-46ae-85e2-6cc273cda19f"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnorriq.shop" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnorriq.shop

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 12h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+1

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

1 findings 0h → B (83)
  • · No H1 heading found

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+6

Medium effort, high structural impact

4 findings 12h → B (89)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · 1 font preload(s) missing `crossorigin` -- font will be downloaded twice
  • · 127 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

Send Feedback