Skip to content
Scanned
2026-05-10 13:48 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
39.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 330ms across 6 locations, fastest from Sao Paulo (281ms), slowest from New York (373ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC).

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
300ms
DNS 37ms · TLS 8ms
United States - Santa Clara
359ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 13ms
United Stated - New York
373ms
DNS 4ms · TLS 8ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
281ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 8ms
Singapore - Singapore
294ms
DNS 5ms · TLS 14ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
370ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 12ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 330ms · Cache: max-age=3600

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page body has only 192 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Empty Page Detection
Critical: 4

Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)

Missing <html lang> attribute -- screen readers default to the user's system language and pronounce content with the wrong phonetics.

Accessibility › Document Language
Critical: 5

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$675 investment → $13,169/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$675
6.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$13,169
$158,031/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+23312% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6500.0 mo payback · +24212% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$75 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~25%.

Barriers
6
1 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+25pp
added vs baseline
Score
75
B
Speed
1
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 8.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 6.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Thin content
    Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first
    → Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$675 6.8 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$75 3 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

$19,896 / month at risk ~$238,755 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$6,771 /mo

+25.2pp bounce · ~2,517 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.33 /mo

4103.6 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~410 KB per page load
    Saves $0.33/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

62
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
86
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.54 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

8.49 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

22 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.62 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

8.50 s

Desktop

97
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
91
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

932 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.09 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

932 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.09 s

Categories

8
Avg score 80.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

HSTS · 2429 peers
You 82
·
Avg 75
+7 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P94Performance P84Accessibility P84Sustainability P72SEO P35Content P36Infrastructure P47

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 59 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 91% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →
HTTP/3 · 1402 peers
You 82
·
Avg 75
+7 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P96Accessibility P87Performance P81Infrastructure P36Content P42Sustainability P58SEO P45

Top 10% of HTTP/3 sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 59 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 93% of HTTP/3 sites See full HTTP/3 benchmark →

Technology stack

HSTS, hosted on Render, with Cloudflare CDN

4 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
HSTS HTTP/3
CDN
Cloudflare
Hosting
Render

All Detected Technologies (4)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Render is a cloud computing platform that provides a wide range of services, including web hosting, cloud computing, and application development. Render offers several hosting options, including static site hosting, web application hosting, and managed databases.

Categories PaaS Website https://render.com Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffantasyteamadvice.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/90dabe0f-2f20-4649-9fc4-c5793f37c1fd)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/90dabe0f-2f20-4649-9fc4-c5793f37c1fd"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffantasyteamadvice.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffantasyteamadvice.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (87)
  • · Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · Page body has only 192 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (89)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback