Audit overview
Accessibility needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
4High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
1High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Page weighs 19.3 MB (4.5 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
1 button(s) with no accessible text
Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.
1 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
186 third-party resources (100% of weight)
Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.
187 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing
High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
CHF 650 investment → CHF 7,711/month returns + CHF 250,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~25%.
- Page takes 17.6s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 15.1s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 1.9sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- No skip-to-content linkKeyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page→ Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element
- 1 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
CHF 250’000
- No privacy policy link detectednDSG/FADP: CHF 1’000 – CHF 250’000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundnDSG/FADP: CHF 1’000 – CHF 250’000
- Trackers detected but no privacy policy foundnDSG/FADP: CHF 1’000 – CHF 250’000
Bounce-Rate Cost
CHF 7’710 /mo
+24.9pp bounce · ~2,489 lost visitors/mo
CPC: CHF 3.10
Bandwidth Waste
CHF 1.00 /mo
14077.1 MB/mo × 0.071 CHF/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.4 MB per page loadSaves CHF 1.00/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
4.76 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
17.62 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
1.90 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.002
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
9.07 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
21.56 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.15 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
3.76 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
95 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.050
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.17 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
3.94 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 19.3 MB (4.5 MB transferred)
Security
All checks pass
Accessibility
1 button(s) with no accessible text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Amazon Route 53 sites score 93+ on Infrastructure; you're at 84 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Drupal, hosted on Google Cloud, with Google Cloud CDN CDN
Stack Architecture
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
Matomo Analytics 
VWO 
Drupal 
HTTP/3 Microsoft Microsoft 365 OneTrust 
Open Graph 
Priority Hints 
Sentry 
Swiper 
UpSellit 
Vue.js 
Google Cloud CDN 
Nginx 
Google Cloud All Detected Technologies (21)
Cloud CDN uses Google's global edge network to serve content closer to users.
Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.
Google Cloud is a suite of cloud computing services.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
Sentry is an open-source platform for workflow productivity, aggregating errors from across the stack in real time.
Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.
UpSellit is a performance based lead and cart abandonment recovery solutions.
Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Matomo Analytics is a free and open-source web analytics application, that runs on a PHP/MySQL web-server.
VWO is a website testing and conversion optimisation platform.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Amazon Route 53) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
21 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/acronis.com)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/acronis.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Facronis.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Facronis.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 5h total → projected B (84)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+6Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 19.3 MB (4.5 MB transferred)
- · 1 button(s) with no accessible text
- · 1 link(s) with no accessible text
- · 186 third-party resources (100% of weight)
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 187 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing