Audit overview
Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Your mail setup has problems.
amadohastaelextremo.es fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, SPF record has no `all` mechanism. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.
Top Priorities (5)
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
1 image(s) missing alt attribute
Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.
2 control(s) without accessible label
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
18 inline style attribute(s) detected
Inline style attributes force `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` in any CSP -- effectively negating CSP's XSS-mitigation value for stylesheets.
2 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener
target="_blank" without rel="noopener" lets the destination tab navigate the original via window.opener -- a reverse-tabnabbing phishing primitive.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€385 investment → €7,358/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.
- Page takes 7.4s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 4.9s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- 21 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- 2 form field(s) without a labelScreen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes→ Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
- Content is hard to readGraduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages→ Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120.500.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundRGPD: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundRGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundePrivacy Directive: EUR 5.000 – EUR 100.000.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€3.036 /mo
+28.3pp bounce · ~2,827 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 1.07
Bandwidth Waste
€0,34 /mo
4598.4 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~460 KB per page loadSaves €0,34/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.93 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
7.39 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.030
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.36 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
7.49 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
662 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.75 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.002
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.00 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
1.77 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
HSTS header is missing
Accessibility
1 image(s) missing alt attribute
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of Cloudflare Bot Management sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Cloudflare Bot Management, with Cloudflare CDN
Stack Architecture
Cart Functionality 
Cloudflare Bot Management 
Google Font API Google Search Console 
Open Graph Cloudflare 
Cloudinary All Detected Technologies (7)
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
Cloudinary is an end-to-end image- and video-management solution for websites and mobile apps, covering everything from image and video uploads, storage, manipulations, optimisations to delivery.
Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.
Cloudflare bot management solution identifies and mitigates automated traffic to protect websites from bad bots.
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Observations (1)
No build tool detected
A framework (Cloudflare Bot Management) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/amadohastaelextremo.es)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/amadohastaelextremo.es"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amadohastaelextremo.es" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amadohastaelextremo.esExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (89)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+3Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · HSTS header is missing
- · 2 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+3Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 2 control(s) without accessible label
- · 1 image(s) missing alt attribute
- · 18 inline style attribute(s) detected